Most Frequently Retroed Jordans of all Time.

9,606
13,357
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
i was sitting around today, and started to think how redundant some retros have become. ESP some 3 times!
so i went through the list in my head, and the Cement 3's came to mind, as well as the IX OG white and black.

cements most recently, as well as in 03, and 94.

IX white black in 2002, CDP, and most recently.

so out of all the jordans, why THESE two  THREE times.?
 
5's... what color-way ? that was 3 times ? and 1's?

im speaking about the same exact shoe , the same way to spec
 
^ yeah 2's, forgot about them in 94.(white, black, red) so thats 3 diff ones to spec... but why ? why THOSE three, basically is what iam asking
 
The black/red I's lead the pack with most times being made...including original release. The dates on some of these may be wrong...

Black/Red I's Mids 5 times (including straps) og's, 95's, 01's, DMP's and straps

White/Black/Red II's 4 times og's, 95's 04's, 10's

White/Cement III's 4 times og's, 95's, 03's, 11's

Black/Cement III's 4 times og's, 95's, 01's, CDP's

White/black/fire red V's 3 times og's, 00's, CDP's

Black/Infrared VI's 3 times og's, 01's, 10's

Black/Red VII's NOT RAPTORS 3 times (If you count those horrendous DMP's) og's, 02's, DMP's

White/Black IX's 4 times og's, 02's, CDP's, 10's

Black/Red XI's 3 times og's, 02's, CDP's

White/Navy/flint XIII's 3 times og's, 05's, 10's
 
Originally Posted by ijapino

The black/red I's lead the pack with most times being made...including original release. The dates on some of these may be wrong...

Black/Red I's Mids 5 times (including straps) og's, 95's, 01's, DMP's and straps

White/Black/Red II's 4 times og's, 95's 04's, 10's

White/Cement III's 4 times og's, 95's, 03's, 11's

Black/Cement III's 4 times og's, 95's, 01's, CDP's

White/black/fire red V's 3 times og's, 00's, CDP's

Black/Infrared VI's 3 times og's, 01's, 10's

Black/Red VII's NOT RAPTORS 3 times (If you count those horrendous DMP's) og's, 02's, DMP's

White/Black IX's 4 times og's, 02's, CDP's, 10's

Black/Red XI's 3 times og's, 02's, CDP's

White/Navy/flint XIII's 3 times og's, 05's, 10's
should have been more specific, not including OGs. but retros.
for the 1's the its just two - 94s and 01s IMO as far as legitimacy to rightful OG
 
i can see the cements being retroed 3 times, as well as the black and red 3's... but white and red IX's, white and red 2's.. ?? why so many times, not top sellers or all time fav jordans amongst enthusiasts.
 
Originally Posted by bwood056

should have been more specific, not including OGs. but retros.
for the 1's the its just two - 94s and 01s IMO as far as legitimacy to rightful OG

I understand not counting the straps, but how come you don't count the DMP's?
 
Originally Posted by ijapino

Originally Posted by bwood056

should have been more specific, not including OGs. but retros.
for the 1's the its just two - 94s and 01s IMO as far as legitimacy to rightful OG

I understand not counting the straps, but how come you don't count the DMP's?

simply quality compared to the others before it. i mean it was practically plastic. 
the shine that appeared from the toebox just threw it way away from the previous retros.

and i understand the quality is all on the downslide.

. i guess its like comparing white on white forces now. to white on white forces from 03 and backwards. looks like two diff shoes. 
 
By the end of the year:

Black/Silver V -4 times OG, OO, 07, 11

Black/Red XIV - 3 times OG, 05. 11

Concord XI - 3 times (4 if counting DMP) OG, 00, 06 (DMP) 11

Black/Cement III - 5 Times (Overall Record) OG, 94, 01, CDP 08, 11

True Blue III - 4 Times OG, 01, 09 International, 11
 
Originally Posted by bwood056

i can see the cements being retroed 3 times, as well as the black and red 3's... but white and red IX's, white and red 2's.. ?? why so many times, not top sellers or all time fav jordans amongst enthusiasts.

if they flood the market with the more popular lines, they will loose their appeal i guess.... makes them "less special" ....

they might just have abundant spare parts/raw materials for these particular models, hence the constant retro-ing. Low manufacturing cost etc...

Im glad they retro'ed the white.black IX's last yr, its an underated shoe IMO.
  
 
Originally Posted by bwood056

Originally Posted by ijapino

Originally Posted by bwood056

should have been more specific, not including OGs. but retros.
for the 1's the its just two - 94s and 01s IMO as far as legitimacy to rightful OG

I understand not counting the straps, but how come you don't count the DMP's?

simply quality compared to the others before it. i mean it was practically plastic. 
the shine that appeared from the toebox just threw it way away from the previous retros.

and i understand the quality is all on the downslide.

. i guess its like comparing white on white forces now. to white on white forces from 03 and backwards. looks like two diff shoes. 
As true as that may be, you can't really exclude the release just because of the quality.

Bad quality or not, it still came out.

If that's the case, most of the retroes after around '03 or so wouldn't count either after comparing them to the OG's.
 
Of the dome, the I, II, IX, V, XII, VI, IV. That's if you're talking about the shoe and not the CW
 
It will be the black-cement grey 3 once it releases later this year
because I don't count the straps or alphas or done a that, dmps yes of course
however inferior.

Depending on if there is a banned 1 and how it looks exactly - that would tie the b/c 3
perhaps.
 
Originally Posted by mjmoney23

By the end of the year:

Black/Silver V -4 times OG, OO, 07, 11

Black/Red XIV - 3 times OG, 05. 11

Concord XI - 3 times (4 if counting DMP) OG, 00, 06 (DMP) 11

Black/Cement III - 5 Times (Overall Record) OG, 94, 01, CDP 08, 11

True Blue III - 4 Times OG, 01, 09 International, 11
I was just about to put the True Blues. 
        Alot of people forget those have been retroed alot. 
 
Back
Top Bottom