- 9,385
- 11,598
View media item 1686732
This is probably what we should expect for the toe box shape.
This is probably what we should expect for the toe box shape.
Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro "White/Cement" - The Aftermath - NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kennmo08,
- Start date
- 895
- 739
And the height of the "wings" placement from the midsole up, wings should be plastic, not leather, and actual free netting (not glued) and correct angle of the netting on the side panels/tongue, and correct shade of gray, shape of overall shoe, etc.. etc... we will see these 2016 "Remastered IV lol
Last edited:
- 9,385
- 11,598
One thing i notice too is that the speckle pattern is alot denser than it was on the 99, which is a good sign
- 31
- 38
Ummm, Ok am I trippin' or is there no damn air bubble here?? Looks like in the middle of the midsole there'es a faint line the size of the air unit but seriously ya'll I dont think there is one on this damn shoe lol. On another note, I gotta be honest I was probably one of the most hyped up for this "remastering" project. To finally get the quality we'd been waiting for i didnt care what it would cost. But until the SBB 1s I truly dont believe there has been an upgrade in quality shape and materials that warrant the price increase . This, which has fully solidified JBs unfortunate deception to the loyal consumers....us smh. My point is, unfortunately I dont expect anything really different from the '12 pair aside form NA branding and one level increase in leather grade. No correct color, no correct netting, no proper padded tougue, no proper spacing between the stitched pieces, no perfect lil bump in the back under the NA and no overall correct shape smh...sad. And I'll still probably snatch 'em up .....even more sad lol.
- 716
- 45
I think those are GS.
- 1,516
- 472
I can see these will be the most hyped shoe of the 1st quarter of 2016. Following the Jordan 12 "Flu Games" finishing off 2016.
- 53
- 13
Can't wait! Savages will be out lurking hard for these. I know I will.
- 7,630
- 9,676
We're all trying to draw conclusions from a blurry Lochness Monster photo.
- 5,252
- 7,895
these will be my xmas present to myself. no problem dropping 5 on 2 pears if their done right
- 5,853
- 1,515
Xmas in February?
- 2,248
- 611
Everyone sweating these hard and don't blame yall. I'll still be rocking my Jumpman logo ones while yall can fight each other to death just to floss these around come next Feb lol
- 7,297
- 8,076
airthompson
Staff member
- 13,824
- 9,623
Molds are exactly the same IMO. Boxed toe, overly high and thin tongue, short in height. All 4s after the '12 Wht Cements have been completely same in mold. Remastered means nothing but material change… if even that.
- 274
- 53
Makes sense...but what about things like wing placement and the netting wouldnt those go into consideration when your remastering
- 123
- 562
I would be willing to bet money that if someone posted a picture of a 100% true to OG version of the upcoming release, people would still find something to complain about and dissect.
You have people clamoring for an exact replica of the 99s and others who pine for an exact OG likeness. You can't have it both ways.
This will undoubtedly have a different cut/shape/build than the previous retros... And that's okay.
If the quality is on par with the white/columbia **excuse me** white/LEGEND BLUE 4s from earlier this year, we're going to have a great release on our hands.
Compared to what came out in 2012, I think this will be a substantial upgrade on all fronts.
You have people clamoring for an exact replica of the 99s and others who pine for an exact OG likeness. You can't have it both ways.
This will undoubtedly have a different cut/shape/build than the previous retros... And that's okay.
If the quality is on par with the white/columbia **excuse me** white/LEGEND BLUE 4s from earlier this year, we're going to have a great release on our hands.
Compared to what came out in 2012, I think this will be a substantial upgrade on all fronts.
- 324
- 91
I actually seen these in person and they have the same shape As the teal 4s.
- 7,297
- 8,076
You seen the 2016 version?
- 324
- 91
Yep
- 324
- 91
They were in a sz 14 but they still looked good. Leather on there is ON POINT.
- 7,297
- 8,076
- 3
- 12
2016 is gonna be crazy! wc4, all them 12s, 10s city pack. just hope theyre gonna be good quality especially since for both the wc4s and flu games both had horrible quality for their last release.
- 324
- 91
Poor guy. Like I really need to lie on nike talk to impress the likes of you.
- 2,715
- 9,057
I'm not really tryin' to change the subject, but I swear if I could JUST get the Black/Cements with the '99 mold I'd be cool.
These are MY AIR JORDAN GRAILS!!!
I mean HOW hard is it to make the exact SAME shoe? All that "We lost the OG molds" is FRESH PURE D DONKEY WITH A MIXTURE OF ELEPHANT & RAT ****. I mean If so, why couldn't they just buy some OG's or '99's from a reseller? They could EASILY DO THAT, & RECONSTRUCT the shoe from there. But y'all already know they ain't doin' that, because their goin' to sell out regardless... I just UNDS'd my 2012's the other day to try them on. I kept em in the box since '12 because I heard mass people complain about paint chipping/cracking. I put some SolComfort Absorbing pads from Wal-Mart in them, because I heard a real thin pad helps prevent it. But I don't think I should've, I think I might've stressed the midsole a bit. I'll post a pic later, but man just give me THIS ****** SHOE ALREADY! I'll take em with the Jumpman on the heel tab @ this point. Just as long as the height, shape, mesh & netting is fixed, also DURABUCK material. Sorry 4 my rant y'all. I'm still 50/50 on buyin' these, I'll have to see better quality pics. Hopefully we get Nike Air Fire Red & Military Blue "Remasters" also.
Last edited:
- 324
- 91
Bro. You're really a sorry dude. I make fun of people that argue on NT therefore I will not engage in this pathetic convo with you.
Just an FYI I am friends with MJs kid and that's how I seen them. Believe it or not, what you eat don't make me ****, so...
- 3,109
- 8,185
So no OG/99 height? Smdh
