- Jan 11, 2008
- 193
- 10
Yea for $125 over here too. I'm good!
Nike Dunk Low - Black 3M
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by dellibedaboss,
- Start date
- Feb 21, 2008
- 434
- 46
Nobody has pictures of theirs up yet? I should be getting my box in the mail next week, I'll post some pics to give guys a different look at them.
- Jan 15, 2008
- 1,003
- 10
yeah i got my pair yesterday, bday present to myself, got charged 135 though, o well. Ill probably sell em if i can, ill put pics up later tonight
- Jan 13, 2009
- 340
- 10
- Mar 5, 2005
- 11,866
- 13,942
TERRIBLE in person.
- Mar 7, 2008
- 155
- 10
Couldnt DISAGREE more with that comment...wearing mine today at the office and they look great
- Mar 4, 2006
- 543
- 11
any shops in H-TOWN? Got everyone distracted with the yeezy release....now I can cop that slept on heat....!
reeeem0
Banned
- Apr 6, 2008
- 2,388
- 30
too damn plain for 125
shoe city got em tho
shoe city got em tho
- Jan 15, 2008
- 1,003
- 10
no way
- Jul 19, 2008
- 9,611
- 14
I want 'em.
- May 4, 2006
- 3,831
- 59
looks good for me, where in socal to cop?
- Dec 28, 2004
- 18,903
- 1,184
will be my first pair of dunks. wish they were cheaper and SB to kill two birds with one stone (1st dunk &SB) but o well.
- Jan 4, 2008
- 5,940
- 22
They're "technically" SB.
- Mar 5, 2005
- 11,866
- 13,942
That's too bad. But if you enjoy them, that's fine. $125 + tax wasted in my opinion. The 3M is hardly reflective, and the black meshdoesn't fit with the shoe. This is how a 3M shoe is done:
Leather or nubuck, and some 3M that really pops off. Not that stuff they use now that they try to pass off as 3M. I was excited for them when the initialpictures were shown. But in person, I couldn't have been more disappointed.
- Jan 23, 2003
- 541
- 30
How's that? Because of the zoom air? I guess you could say it's like the newer SB's (thin tongue like a regular dunk)
- Dec 29, 2006
- 6,782
- 18
Where else online can I cop? PYS is sold out of sizes over 9.
- Aug 5, 2007
- 3,000
- 11
=]] grabbed mine for 67
i think these are really nice
yes the 3m doesn't pop but it's still a nice subtle touch
the icy sole is piff though
i think these are really nice
yes the 3m doesn't pop but it's still a nice subtle touch
the icy sole is piff though
- Mar 4, 2006
- 543
- 11
^ wow 67? I got mine at Houston Galleria's sheikz for 135 after tax....SMH WOW! Just so yall know though....still got a good size amount over there
- Jan 30, 2005
- 3,207
- 802
co-sign...
- Feb 21, 2008
- 434
- 46
Here are few pics as promised. Not sure what the guys are talking about when thy say the 3m isn't that reflective..anyway here you go, judge for yourself.
With Flash:
And No Flash:
With Flash:
And No Flash:
- Jun 28, 2008
- 9,475
- 2,963
Wow Nice Pictures Fam, Been Waiting For Pics Like That
- Apr 16, 2008
- 3,119
- 79
Wow
.....
- May 1, 2006
- 2,097
- 216
footlockers??
- Oct 22, 2005
- 655
- 17
are these released yet?
- Feb 21, 2008
- 434
- 46
Thanks for the compliments guys.
Oh and for those wondering, the material on the shoe (toebox and side pannels) is not 'mesh' its regular woven nylon with cross stitching to give aperforated look.
Oh and for those wondering, the material on the shoe (toebox and side pannels) is not 'mesh' its regular woven nylon with cross stitching to give aperforated look.
