The main thing I noticed was the shape, why are they so flat looking
It's all a snowball effect that starts with the materials, right?
I've pretty much given up on the possibility of the shape being true to the original on any and all Nike/JB retros, regardless of model. Part of that is that the cheaper materials don't sit (or give) the same way. ...It;s like how implants can never capture the beauty of natural breasts because they don't actually behave like natural breasts.
If you fix the materials, the shape MIGHT follow, at least on some models.
But, the midsole is c'om man status. Even if you are going to cheap out crazy on the materials itself, use the correct damn design.
As sinner P said - I'm not sure if this is a retro fail or a hybrid fail.
Nike isn't stupid overall, but I don't think they completely get the segmentation of the market for different products of theirs. I mean, I know they do tons of market research. But, unless they have some crazy marketing plan up their sleeves for this one, this is a niche shoe. The Agassi line is appreciated by serious, older, knowledgeable collectors - look at who posts in this thread and who doesn't. The people who want this shoe care about those things and have exhibited the willpower to pass, or at the very least wait for deep discounts, on products that don't live up to their standards. I don't blame Nike for pushing the envelope and seeing what they can get away with on Foams, Jordans, etc. The market is essentially TELLING YOU to do that. But, some products won't move unless you do more than the bare minimum; I don't think it takes a genius to identify some of those products.