No Heisman Thread?

[andrewluck]

Yeah we get it you don't want the "white collar" to trump the "it" factor player. Move along son.

 

[ThaxbyChamblis]

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

that picture is gonna be used a lot on here for next couple of years

 

[airblaster503]

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

Originally Posted by airblaster503

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

RG3 was down 35-0 against OSU, if you want to play the "I've only seen one game so that's how Andrew Luck must be".
Andrew Luck as someone said above is the Tim Tebow of this draft.
White collar guy, talks about his team mates more than himself, hyped up and then goes out there and puts up pretty impressive numbers but is over rated because the media hypes him up to be Messiah. People just don't wanna see Luck succeed for some reason. I just don't get it.

Man nobody is arguing that he won't be that good in the NFL.  But he clearly didn't deserve to win the Heisman this year.  You can't go off the logic that because he might be the best prospect and might have the best NFL career that he should automatically win the Heisman.  That is what you are trying to do.  RG3 and Monte Ball had much more impressive games this year than Luck, and that is why RG3 won the damn trophy.  The Heisman is for the best player for the season, not the best NFL prospect.

Where did I say he should win it because of that? Nice reading comprehension. Why don't you like Andrew Luck?

Man then what is your argument to why Luck should have won the Heisman, you are pulling out all this crap about what he will be in the NFL but that doesn't prove that he should have won.  You might not have directly said that is your reason but that is the direction all your arguments have gone to.  As for why I don't like Luck, it's not that I don't like him.  I am just tired of him being crowned the next coming of Peyton Manning and the best QB prospect in 10 years.  Like slow the roll here.  He also didn't have a huge standout year like everyone was expecting.  I think he will have a good career but right now I don't see him being everything he has been hyped up to be.


And

at that Mike Brown picture, first time I've seen that. 

 

[andrewluck]

Andrew Luck had 3 more touchdowns and one more int this year, yet he "underperformed".

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

Andrew Luck had 3 more touchdowns and one more int this year, yet he "underperformed".

DEAL WITH IT

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

You try to hard

 

[andrewluck]

You really like sweaty men wrestling all day don't you?

 

[ricky409]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

^^^

i love your trolling AndrewLuck. Very refreshing. Just to let you know though, RGIII actually threw his WRs open, or
DID fit the ball into tight windows. Even though Luck had those slow lumbering TEs and WRs on his team, they would still (somehow)
manage to be running free down the field. And when they make the catch, the announcers are like "OH MY GOD *FAP FAP FAP* DID YOU SEE THAT BEAUTIFUL PINPOINT PRECISION PASS!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!", when the pass actually looked like the hail mary Tyler Palko
threw last week.

I do believe both QBs will be successful (depending on the team), but I see RGIII doing a lot more with his skill than Luck will with
his. Like I said before, the speed of the game will catch up to Luck, and you see what happened to Luck when there was real speed
and awareness on the field (Oregon). Dude was shook out of his mind, and looked like a completely average QB. RGIII may have had
more losses than Luck, but he never looked shook like Luck did either during those losses.

this is so true..

they used to do this for OJ Mayo... 

i think it was Len Elmore or that other black dude...

straight BEASTING when the fambs simply inbounded the ball.

 

[airblaster503]

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

Andrew Luck had 3 more touchdowns and one more int this year, yet he "underperformed".

Point is Luck played more of a role of a game manager this year and had a really good run game to back him up.  He didn't put the team on his back like RG3.  If RG3 wasn't at Baylor they probably would have won less than 5 games.  If Luck wasn't at Stanford they still would probably have been a 9+ win team.  I am officially done with my responses. 

 

[Peep Game]

Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay

You try to hard

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

Originally Posted by AndrewLuck

You really like sweaty men wrestling all day don't you?

Got heem

 

[Peep Game]

^^^Jumpman, weren't you also in the wrestling thread awhile ago? Don't front now and act like that's foreign to u man

 

[jumpmanfromdabay]

Originally Posted by Peep Game

^^^Jumpman, weren't you also in the wrestling thread awhile ago? Don't front now and act like that's foreign to u man

Do u see me posting wrestling gifs?

 

[651akathepaul]

Thing is, Andrew Luck the poster is kind of right, but it has no implications on the Heisman. Luck, the player, is more developed and refined than the talent and game around him allows.

Griffin is deservedly the Heisman winner, but a lot of that is materialized from variables that go beyond the real meaning of what a player means to his team. It's not MVP we're talking here, because that is probably Luck.

 

[N41D]

No, even if it's MVP, it's still Robert Griffin... Baylor is 4-8 without him at best.

 

[theone2401]

Both will be studs  

 

[MON5T3R]

Alright so whos backup sn is this?

Oh and RG3 deserved it no doubt.

 

[stillin729]

I don't think Luck was beating the teams RG3 beat with a Baylor squad

 

[ThaxbyChamblis]

Originally Posted by theone2401

Both will be studs  

Yep. Pretty much

 

[jville819]

The biggest joke of all was Mathieu being there

 

[extraordinary swag]

on my trip to NY I just happened to be right next door outside Junior's cheesecake while the Heisman candidates trotted in to the ceremony