- 5,217
- 118
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
I already have a strong personal opinion on this matter but I thought this would make an interesting discussion topic.
Obama has been accused of being a Muslim socialist bent on imposing Sharia law on America. First there were the accusations that he wasn't truly American. He was accused of being Kenyan or Indonesian and not eligible for office. Then he was accused of being a Muslim and not a Christian. There are some that say that his time spent living in Indonesia as a boy and the "influence" of his Muslim Kenyan family, that he never saw, formed him into the Muslim man he is today. Then there are those that say he isn't a "true" Christian. That his faith is not like that of mainstream Protestantism. He is accused of focusing too much on the social aspects of the gospel, am emphasis on helping the poor, and going directly against certain mainstream biblical interpretations, being for a women's right to choose an abortion and being for same-sex marriage.
To me, it's pretty clear that Obama is a liberal Christian or really good at hiding his non-belief. He's one that doesn't interpret the book literally and has admitted as much. He's said:
“Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application?”
He focuses on the parts of the book that most people, Christians, other religions, and non-believers alike, would agree are good. Helping the poor for instance. He has championed causes that benefit the poor, universal health care and a lower tax burden on the middle class and below. For that, he's accused by the GOP as trying to bring socialism to America. I don't see it that way.
Getting to the root of the problem by trying to make it better for those in poverty directly affects all of us Americans. Crime rates, unwanted pregnancies, and low levels of education are all directly tied to poverty. You want less abortions? Help the poor. Educate on safe sex. Don't demonize contraceptives. You want people to stop killing each other? Give them a better education so they have a way out. Give them a chance at economic mobility. You want to get the economy going again? A better educated populace is a more innovative one. So I don't buy that argument that he's a trying to ruin America via socialism.
The other point of discussion I wanted to touch on is why the religion right don't seem to mind that Mitt Romney is a devout Mormon. While they have no trouble skewering Obama for a perceived perversion of the faith, Mitt Romney is a firm believer in a faith that is starkly different from that of mainstream Protestantism. Mormons have their own religious texts apart from the bible. Mormon's religious practices and rituals are very different from Protestants. Mormon's idea of salvation is fundamentally different. For the longest time, Mormonism was considered a cult by mainstream Protestants.
So why does Mitt Romney get a pass? Why now?
Obama has been accused of being a Muslim socialist bent on imposing Sharia law on America. First there were the accusations that he wasn't truly American. He was accused of being Kenyan or Indonesian and not eligible for office. Then he was accused of being a Muslim and not a Christian. There are some that say that his time spent living in Indonesia as a boy and the "influence" of his Muslim Kenyan family, that he never saw, formed him into the Muslim man he is today. Then there are those that say he isn't a "true" Christian. That his faith is not like that of mainstream Protestantism. He is accused of focusing too much on the social aspects of the gospel, am emphasis on helping the poor, and going directly against certain mainstream biblical interpretations, being for a women's right to choose an abortion and being for same-sex marriage.
To me, it's pretty clear that Obama is a liberal Christian or really good at hiding his non-belief. He's one that doesn't interpret the book literally and has admitted as much. He's said:
“Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application?”
He focuses on the parts of the book that most people, Christians, other religions, and non-believers alike, would agree are good. Helping the poor for instance. He has championed causes that benefit the poor, universal health care and a lower tax burden on the middle class and below. For that, he's accused by the GOP as trying to bring socialism to America. I don't see it that way.
Getting to the root of the problem by trying to make it better for those in poverty directly affects all of us Americans. Crime rates, unwanted pregnancies, and low levels of education are all directly tied to poverty. You want less abortions? Help the poor. Educate on safe sex. Don't demonize contraceptives. You want people to stop killing each other? Give them a better education so they have a way out. Give them a chance at economic mobility. You want to get the economy going again? A better educated populace is a more innovative one. So I don't buy that argument that he's a trying to ruin America via socialism.
The other point of discussion I wanted to touch on is why the religion right don't seem to mind that Mitt Romney is a devout Mormon. While they have no trouble skewering Obama for a perceived perversion of the faith, Mitt Romney is a firm believer in a faith that is starkly different from that of mainstream Protestantism. Mormons have their own religious texts apart from the bible. Mormon's religious practices and rituals are very different from Protestants. Mormon's idea of salvation is fundamentally different. For the longest time, Mormonism was considered a cult by mainstream Protestants.
So why does Mitt Romney get a pass? Why now?