- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,459
- 12,584
He was also the DC for some quality Bronco teams, but yes the point is he's an average NFL HC, which should roughly translate to about a top 25 coach in CFB. From an X&O standpoint week to week the game is significantly easier than it is in the pros.
Sark didn't get fired until 10/12, Helton was 5-4 that season as a HC. Am I supposed to be impressed that Helton beat Utah and a Jim Mora led UCLA that season?
I think we disagree in that I think Del Rio is an elite DC and a terrible head coach who mismanaged talent and who has had two decades of evidence to show that. I don’t know why that would change at the college level. In 2 full seasons as a HC I don’t know what Clay is but I know with enough talent he’ll win 9-11 games and will always compete for the conference championship. I’d take that over Del Rio’s “should be top 25” every day, even with the accusations of Clay’s teams being “soft”.
Clay’s outperformed most of his peers like Herman in similar positions (yes Darnold, but also death penalty sanctions.) I can see letting go of Clay following an 11-3 conference championship year and 10-3 rose bowl year for Urban Meyer, Nick Saban, or even a really really good coach like Gary Patterson, but for Jack Del Rio? For what? He’s a rich man’s Jim Mora. Should Clay be better? Absolutely. Do I think he’s fools gold? Probably. There are glaring and awful issues in his coaching style and results obtained from it. But I think there’s a lot of dissonance in the way people think about and grade Clay against other coaches.
Last edited: