- Apr 9, 2017
- 16,984
- 47,061
Bacon tastes good on bred, especially if you have cheese. Might as well scrape the egg off his face and have breakfast.
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,168
- 70,140
- Feb 7, 2010
- 8,071
- 15,109
yes, they're overrated
haven't held them in hand and I believe you when you say the leather is better
the leather damn well better be nice if they cost 2k
the fact that ppl are paying upwards of 8k in some sizes makes them overrated...these ppl have more money than brains
- Dec 20, 2014
- 3,982
- 14,397
Via IG...
- Apr 9, 2017
- 16,984
- 47,061
Nope. Nah. Naw.
- Oct 3, 2010
- 19,217
- 21,072
Shoulda kept them there
- Nov 17, 2020
- 753
- 3,424
kilroythedon
Supporter
- Feb 20, 2013
- 23,187
- 22,078
Via IG...
yuck
- Apr 22, 2014
- 6,770
- 7,362
I just bought a pair of Mochas a few days ago but waiting for them to ship. Seeing the quality talk about the shadow 2.0s is making me wonder what the quality is for Mochas. Good? Bad? Decent?
Last edited:
lilbrad407
Supporter
- Aug 11, 2014
- 1,915
- 9,567
Decent imo
- Sep 17, 2016
- 2,760
- 4,801
- Dec 20, 2014
- 3,982
- 14,397
Still No Love???
- Sep 10, 2016
- 1,785
- 1,777
Are the Shadow 2.0s quality awfully bad as the Retros we’ve gotten in the mid 2000s to early 2010s or are they bad as in it’s okay but disappointing compared to recent releases? The low prices make me want to jump on them.
D_eezus
formerly zombifed nach0
- Feb 22, 2013
- 17,413
- 17,141
Nothing can save these….Via IG...
if some how these end up $600+ i’ll be flabbergasted
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,193
- 13,480
Hell even $300, I'll be surprised.
- Mar 9, 2013
- 23,560
- 30,750
Got the 2.0 from snkrs in yesterday. shadow 1.0 is the only one worth keeping
- Oct 3, 2004
- 4,602
- 5,452
Still No Love???
This is a HIGH thread.
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,168
- 70,140
- Jul 4, 2015
- 1,994
- 6,323
- Sep 5, 2014
- 3,113
- 38,173
At least they're better than the Patinas.
- Feb 10, 2014
- 4,036
- 9,698
I just received my 2.0s. The only retro + colorway I have besides the rookies. I don’t see any issues in quality. Leather and stiffness feels the same as other OG highs, my assumption is that the leather on these aren’t tumbled as the other highs hence the stiffness I.e. like the qtr panels of the ‘16 banneds. I much prefer the untreated leather as it has more sheen compared to tumble. Deciding whether to keep or use as trade bait aha
- Jul 4, 2015
- 1,994
- 6,323
The tongue cushion on those 2.0s are thin compared to other og highs
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- Oct 1, 2004
- 18,654
- 49,520
They flip flop on the tongues but I haven't seen the stiff tongue on I's since like 2018 or something.
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,069
- 14,302
oh, u flexin the rollie?At least they're better than the Patinas.
-NT
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,069
- 14,302
your 1s collection must be EXTREMELY limited if you think the leather on these is par for the course. your are very mistakenI just received my 2.0s. The only retro + colorway I have besides the rookies. I don’t see any issues in quality. Leather and stiffness feels the same as other OG highs, my assumption is that the leather on these aren’t tumbled as the other highs hence the stiffness I.e. like the qtr panels of the ‘16 banneds. I much prefer the untreated leather as it has more sheen compared to tumble. Deciding whether to keep or use as trade bait aha
