- 3,677
- 57
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
It's amazing that Davidson is even competitive. I'm watching this game and Curry has to do EVERYTHING. He passes the ball to a player under the rim andhe can't even make a layup.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
yep. Richards was much more vital last year when Curry went off for 30 in the 2nd half vs Gonzaga. you are 100% correct.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
As far as Davidson's success goes, Jason Richards was/is more important than Steph.
it's sad how you and Allen are still salty over Curry ousting your teams in the dance last year.
he shot 8 for 21.
Whatever.
if only Curry had a serviceable supporting cast.
and in the same breath, you discredit Richards.
so........obviously he had one last year, correct?
and in the same breath, you discredit Richards.
Originally Posted by Solemate96
Sonya Curry
answer: Curry was forced to play pg on a team full of bums. yes, Richards was valuable last year- but do you realize why Richards looked good lastyear? CURRY. he averaged 8 assists per game last year because he had the pleasure of passing to Curry. Curry CARRIED Davidson last year, Richards was justalong for the ride. all Richards did was take the burden off of Curry a bit.Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
Davidson went from winning three games in the NCAA Tournament to losing in the second round of the NIT.
The only other relevant player besides Richards that they lost after last season was Sander.
So, what happened?
Originally Posted by Kiddin Like Jason
As far as Davidson's success goes, Jason Richards was/is more important than Steph.