- 2,239
- 646
Vegas hosting any professional sports team is a horrible decision. Seattle or Portland would've been a much better decision. But I'm speaking without any facts.
It's not like young, rich athletes have any problems finding trouble in NYC/LA/CHI/etc. If a player wants to party, do drugs, and not focus on their career they'll find a way no matter what city they are in. (e.g. Ryan Malone/ Mike Richards)
And it's not like the NHL just chose Vegas out of a hat. The only choices were Vegas and/or Quebec. Seattle and Portland need to- A. Have an arena and B. Want a team badly enough to actually submit an expansion bid.
Good thing Vegas makes more so much more sense hockeywise than Quebec City or Hamilton...
How exactly does one city make more sense "hockey wise" than another? Long term financial viability? Sure, you could have a case, as that will be entirely dependent upon how successful Vegas is at putting out a winning team, same as 60% of the teams in the league. The real reason Quebec isn't getting a team right now is the imbalance in conferences. There's no doubt in my mind that it won't be long until Karmanos sells the Canes and they end up in Quebec. As for Hamilton, same as Seattle and Portland, they might want to actually submit a bid if they want to be in consideration for a potential team.
Last edited: