- Mar 3, 2006
- 24,717
- 436
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners. Most teams aren't making money. They want to resolve that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by JapanAir21
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners. Most teams aren't making money. They want to resolve that.
Originally Posted by JapanAir21
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners. Most teams aren't making money. They want to resolve that.
Originally Posted by Zyzz
Originally Posted by thekillerj23
Sucks that the lottery pick is protected
i think everyone knew it was gonna be protected but how is it protected? top 5?
Protected 1-to-14 in 2012, 1-to-13 in 2013, 1-to-12 in 2014, 1-to-10 from 2015-2017. If first-round pick is not conveyed from SAC to CLE by 2017, then Kings convey their 2017 second-rounder to Cavaliers (protected 56-60).
That's the kind of attitude that gets you no where.Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Theres a reason they aren't making money... they suckOriginally Posted by JapanAir21
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners. Most teams aren't making money. They want to resolve that.
That's the kind of attitude that gets you no where.Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Theres a reason they aren't making money... they suckOriginally Posted by JapanAir21
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners. Most teams aren't making money. They want to resolve that.
Originally Posted by Zyzz
Originally Posted by thekillerj23
Sucks that the lottery pick is protected
i think everyone knew it was gonna be protected but how is it protected? top 5?
Protected 1-to-14 in 2012, 1-to-13 in 2013, 1-to-12 in 2014, 1-to-10 from 2015-2017. If first-round pick is not conveyed from SAC to CLE by 2017, then Kings convey their 2017 second-rounder to Cavaliers (protected 56-60).
I honestly can't say I disagree with the owners.
I tend to not agree with billionaire owners, myself.