Official NBA Off-Season Thread. New 2012-2013 Thread Has Been Made. Please Post In There

Status
Not open for further replies.
BillPaxtonGameOverAliens.jpg
 
The last time Nash was in a slower paced, half court offense he didn't look like the same player at all, but whatever.

And then they're getting him for Shumpert so they have nobody to guard Wade
 
Originally Posted by Kevin Cleveland

You know Knicks fans aren't used to having real live defenders on their team when they might burn the city down over Iman Shumpert potentially getting traded.


laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by krazy88s

Originally Posted by Bigmike23


and brook lopez couldnt rebound in high school what makes yall net fans think he is going to start now?

No Nets fans here think he was. Where are you reading this?

yall talking about its only because he is lazy and who he plays next to why his numbers are low
  
 
So the deal right now would be Shumpert, Tony Douglas, Josh Harrelson, and Jerome Jordan for Nash.




Knicks are trying to get a third team involved so they do not have to give up Shump.
 
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm

Nash without Shumpert does not make the Knicks a contender, it puts their ceiling at the ECF. Shump was the best perimeter defender this team has had in years and he will play a pivotal role in our future. You do not trade Shumpert.
QFT.  Shump has too much potential and he's integral to the Knick's "defense."  However, Nash is the 2nd best available PG
ohwell.gif
 Knicks might have to pass 
 
Originally Posted by VC3FAN

So the deal right now would be Shumpert, Tony Douglas, Josh Harrelson, and Jerome Jordan for Nash.

Knicks are trying to get a third team involved so they do not have to give up Shump.
sick.gif
roll.gif
Where's Raymond Felton when you need him
 
Knicks front office is clueless
laugh.gif


never put faith in a 38 year old who can't guard a lawn chair, not to mention it's gonna knock them out of the CP3 sweepstakes a year from now since he bout to get all their cash
 
Originally Posted by PatentBoy23

Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm

Nash without Shumpert does not make the Knicks a contender, it puts their ceiling at the ECF. Shump was the best perimeter defender this team has had in years and he will play a pivotal role in our future. You do not trade Shumpert.
QFT.  Shump has too much potential and he's integral to the Knick's "defense."  However, Nash is the 2nd best available PG
ohwell.gif
 Knicks might have to pass 
I would pass unless he plans to pick up the pace and/or Shump isn't included.

Nash looked like he was declining after D'Antoni was fired until Alvin Gentry stepped in & implored them to run.
 
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm

Nash without Shumpert does not make the Knicks a contender, it puts their ceiling at the ECF. Shump was the best perimeter defender this team has had in years and he will play a pivotal role in our future. You do not trade Shumpert.

No way their ceiling is that high as long as Melo's their "leader."
 
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Originally Posted by Big J 33

The Knicks have been in win-now mode already... If you trade Shumpert you better be damn sure Nash puts you in the Finals. I don't think he's enough so I don't support this move at all, if its true.

You don't think it's enough? you got beat by miami in 5 games, half of them being blowouts, you think Nash makes up that difference of the combined like 30 points you lost by cmon b.

roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
roll.gif
 
Nash is going to look quite ordinary on the Knicks. There's not nearly enough spacing on that team as currently constructed.
 
Originally Posted by VC3FAN

So the deal right now would be Shumpert, Tony Douglas, Josh Harrelson, and Jerome Jordan for Nash.




Knicks are trying to get a third team involved so they do not have to give up Shump.

knicks want nash for free
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh

Originally Posted by Cyber Smoke

Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh



https://twitter.com/#!/WojYahooNBA

and just like that, another decade of irrelevance.

Yes we understand Nash in Toronto would've been a better fit and you guys would of been contenders 
grin.gif
 The Knicks get a little worse defensively but get way better offensively . All these contracts expire at the same time i feel this is a good deal. Your post just reeks of saltiness 
laugh.gif
was talking about the raptors.


to clarify.

1. Shumps not that good, your team is hampered with all these dumb contracts, your capped out, trading shump is not the end of the world he's good but not divorce the team good.
2. The raptors are in a worse position that the knicks without question, the canaadian basketball god just said +!+% canada, we have lost all credibility, we over payed landry fiedls we are doomed. it's over for the enxt decade. bc just set the franchise back a decade.

All better than the Mavs
30t6p3b.gif
 
The Raptors could always withdraw their offer, though they would be looked down upon by future players and agents.
 
I think Jose Calderon has been plenty good in Toronto, he DEFINITELY isnt the problem there. They can save their $40 million and keep Calderon around
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom