- Oct 14, 2008
- 13,903
- 13,332
McDonald's labor costs are well over $1B and a $15 minimum wage would probably increase those costs by hundreds of millions. Corporate executives make far too much money but the excess is taken from stockholders, not the workers
I think we all agree there's a wage level that optimizes the earnings of those subject to the minimum wage. I just don't think we know what that is, or that we should be looking at the minimum wage as an anti-poverty policy
there are better ways at attempting to increase the well-being of those at the bottom end of the income distribution. direct cash assistance is better, the earned income tax credit (basically the same thing as direct cash assistance) is better, wage supports are better
with that said i haven't seen anything to suggest that $15 is the wrong number; it's certainly closer to the right number than $7
There are two issues I think need to be addressed though and one is a thing I have an issue with that you mentioned.
Earned income tax credit. Why do we as the tax payer have to provide this to individuals because a company doesn’t want to pay them a fair wage? We are subsidizing these corporations. Sure itkeeps their costs down and increases stockvalue but when 80% of the stock is owned by 20% of the population it only helps the well off period. We need to to stop doing this.
The second piece is the way corporation allocate hours to people. Fast food places and Walmart are highly guilty of this but they don’t provide people with steady hours and try to keep them under 30 hours per week so they don’t have to provide them with health insurance and other benefits. The lack of steady and consistent hours doesn’t allow individuals to plan their week and day. Something that hurts working parents and people who have other responsibilities. The other piece is again subsidizing corporations at the expense of the worker and then the taxpayer. Some of these workers are then on Medicaid because they don’t make enough to afford healthcare and make so little they qualify for state insurance. Many of these people would like to be full time and would like steady hours, but it’s against the corporations best interest.
We are literally providing corporate welfare and it’s only benefiting the well off. I’m in thetop 20% so yes I do benefit from it. But would I take a 1.5% smaller return on my 401k so I people can live a better life and we would have less wasteful spending?