aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,562
- 90,834
Damn straight white males
He was just called SWM earlier in that clip by that man and his son and he had to counter punch.
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
He was just called SWM earlier in that clip by that man and his son and he had to counter punch.
- Aug 23, 2019
- 4,731
- 13,001
LOTS of people are saying MAYO Pete has a problem with BLACK voters
aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,562
- 90,834
His favorite NFL player (Lamar Jackson) happens to look exactly like our PRESIDENT ELECT so I understand his comments.
SpittaJetLife
Banned
- Feb 14, 2019
- 12,218
- 8,898
Wahedcrats should start preparing for 2024
SpittaJetLife
Banned
- Feb 14, 2019
- 12,218
- 8,898
Lol at Mayo Pete.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
Timid's Pop Warner football induced CTE must be flaring up again.
- Sep 21, 2008
- 49,029
- 61,330
SpittaJetLife
Banned
- Feb 14, 2019
- 12,218
- 8,898
I don’t have CTE word to Antonio Brown.
- Aug 20, 2001
- 29,035
- 64,023
I am convinced bro has tabs open for multiple threads and just goes back and forth spamming each of them with nonsense that isn’t even pertinent to the current substantive debate going on in them. It’s so odd But very consistent
- Dec 23, 2003
- 9,421
- 7,194
Not concerned with him winning
Just pissed that the best two people for the job got blatantly discriminated against
- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,527
- 27,229
Comes down to if you believe getting trump supporters is possible. some people myself included tbh think its a fools errand to try to flip trump supporters and is a waste of time because even if you do flip some the number of em would probably be so small to where it wouldn't be worth it. Where as you'd gain more focusing on just increasing democrat turnout. I think you'd stand to gain more making sure as many dems get off the couch as possible to vote instead of trying to flip trump supporters who up to this point seem just fine going down with trump no matter what.
Last edited:
- May 25, 2004
- 30,344
- 40,894
I’d worry about getting non voters to vote more than trump bots.
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
Mike Bloomberg to Double His $300 Million Campaign Ad Spend in Wake of Chaotic Iowa Caucuses
time.com
Mike Bloomberg to Double His $300 Million Campaign Ad Spend in Wake of Chaotic Iowa Caucuses
He's running an unconventional campaign that hinges on performing well in later contests
- Aug 20, 2001
- 29,035
- 64,023
Mike Bloomberg to Double His $300 Million Campaign Ad Spend in Wake of Chaotic Iowa Caucuses
Mike Bloomberg to Double His $300 Million Campaign Ad Spend in Wake of Chaotic Iowa Caucuses
He's running an unconventional campaign that hinges on performing well in later contests
I get it, why not but I need to see him in action. A debate. A caucus. A rally. A MSM interview. Something. Solely ads ain’t it, chief.
- Dec 15, 2012
- 17,264
- 27,199
Are any of the Democratic candidates increasing voter turnout though? Bernie seems to be the popular candidate and 2016 had a worsevoter turnout than 2008 and 2012 and by all accounts the turnout last night was the same as 2016 which is pretty worrisome given we have a big dumb mongoloid running our country.
And who is doing that though? The reason Pete did so well last night was because he was cleaning up candidates from the non-viable campaigns who didn’t want to go to Bernie or Warren because they are so far left. Increasing voter turnout is great, but if there isn’t an increase in voters in these caucuses and primaries after what happens happened for the last 4 year then there is a pretty serious problem.
- Aug 11, 2012
- 55,518
- 147,148
Republicans talking about Iowa Caucus...when they are literally canceling primaries, and not even allowing other contestants on the ballots is rich
- Dec 15, 2012
- 17,264
- 27,199
Republicans talking about Iowa Caucus...when they are literally canceling primaries, and not even allowing other contestants on the ballots is rich
I doesn’t help that the people who are running against Trump for the republican nomination are racist **** tards like Trump too
- Jul 18, 2013
- 32,880
- 81,663
Well let's see.
Do you believe there are forces at work seeking to influence the political outcomes of elections in America? Congratulations, you're not subscribed to a conspiracy theory. Indeed there are forces at work hoping to successfully bend or in some cases even break our democracy to benefit them. It happens in other countries as well. These actions are performed by countries, corporations and sometimes individuals.
Do you believe that one of these forces is a cabal that selects the president of the united states of america based on genealogy with no regard for the will of the american voter? Congratulations, you're subscribed to a conspiracy theory. There is no group out there that tests the DNA of presidential candidates and determines if you'll be president based on what Ancestry.com says. It's just not feasible. This is a clear case of correlation. Rich white people with a family history that dates back to european aristocracy tend to be related to other rich white people with a family history that dates back to european aristocracy. Surprise.
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
Like trolling vs. not trolling, it probably comes down to whatever
RustyShackleford
deems a conspiracy theoryFor example, based on a reading of Rusty's posts:
The DNC actively delaying the Iowa caucus results to benefit Biden: Conspiracy Theory
President Trump colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 election: Not a conspiracy theory
Last edited:
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,979
- 36,361
,
Messaging is everything. Might be a good time to revisit the BBC documentary "the century of the self"
- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,527
- 27,229
I do agree that turnout being about the same as 2016 is concerning. I think the focus to increase turnout should shift from the candidates and their likability to this is about getting trump out. I would hope that message is enough to motivate people to turnout after the **** show that the last four years was.
- Aug 20, 2001
- 29,035
- 64,023
Republicans talking about Iowa Caucus...when they are literally canceling primaries, and not even allowing other contestants on the ballots is rich
Real talk - who would even run in that primary? And it would be a bad look because you know Trump would make their life a living hell after they took annL
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,979
- 36,361
You're describing the majority of American voters. Unfortunately.
Only 1/3 of American voters can name the three branches of government and tell you they're co-equal.
- May 25, 2004
- 30,344
- 40,894
I didn’t vote last election...
I’ll vote this time even though mn is gonna be blue regardless.
I’ll vote this time even though mn is gonna be blue regardless.
- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
It's cool if you disagree but you're not saying anything of substance right here. If you want to disprove something you have to actually do just that and disprove it. You're just saying 'no, you're wrong' and declaring yourself as some type of winner without doing any work. I've yet to say anything that's untrue but if I have point it out.
Similar threads
