- 1,804
- 500
No not that idea again... The NA logo only needs to be on the proper colorways.. Jumpman should always be reserved forthe rertro plus models.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a crap colorway is a crap colorway whether it has the Nike air or not. Again, I think you're putting more value on the Nike air than its actually worthIt's because many Retro+ colorways look like hot garbage with NA, NIKE soles and NA insoles are fine though.
Wedding only looks good because it's accented identically to the silver tongue. A blue accented silver tongue would look better with NA than Jumpman. But say a Green Glow or Cool Grey 4 with NA, get out of here.The Jordan VI DMP wouldve looked awesome with Nike Air
5's needed NA the most, but it still was never a deal breaker. Don't kill me with the 6's.but the Jumpman Air looks just as good on practically all OG colorways. I still want NA on those tho.My .02 cents, if it came out with NA it should keep NA, if it didn't it shouldn't. Not that it really in most cases. I think 1s are the only model I think the JM looks horrible on, the rest aren't as bad to me.
Wedding only looks good because it's accented identically to the silver tongue. A blue accented silver tongue would look better with NA than Jumpman. But say a Green Glow or Cool Grey 4 with NA, get out of here.
I disagree. JM is tolerable on some OG colorways but doesn't look better than NA on any of them. On the 1s that JM on the tongue staring you in the face, on the rest its on the her where I can't see it while wearing and can forget about it..5's needed NA the most, but it still was never a deal breaker. Don't kill me with the 6's.but the Jumpman Air looks just as good on practically all OG colorways.My .02 cents, if it came out with NA it should keep NA, if it didn't it shouldn't. Not that it really in most cases. I think 1s are the only model I think the JM looks horrible on, the rest aren't as bad to me.
One of my friends cut the Jumpman off the 2013 Chicago's and put a red X on the back, he served some justice. But really 2-6 Retro+ colorways without Junpman Air would look garbage, mind things like the Katrina and Alternates. I like Jumpman Air on the 6's, but all other OG colorways need NA in my eyes.I disagree. JM is tolerable on some OG colorways but doesn't look better than NA on any of them. On the 1s that JM on the tongue staring you in the face, on the rest its on the her where I can't see it while wearing and can forget about it..
I dint say it would look like garbage, just that its my opinion the switch should only occur on shoes that aren't OG color ways..One of my friends cut the Jumpman off the 2013 Chicago's and put a red X on the back, he served some justice. But really 2-6 Retro+ colorways without Junpman Air would look garbage, mind things like the Katrina and Alternates. I like Jumpman Air on the 6's, but all other OG colorways need NA in my eyes.I disagree. JM is tolerable on some OG colorways but doesn't look better than NA on any of them. On the 1s that JM on the tongue staring you in the face, on the rest its on the her where I can't see it while wearing and can forget about it..
Alright, we agree then.I dint say it would look like garbage, just that its my opinion the switch should only occur on shoes that aren't OG color ways..
Thisnikeair belongs on og type shoes. it looks the best.
but when you start putting it on non ogs or different new retros it kinda makes the branding of the nikeair swoosh logo less "original" or "special"
basically meaning that Nike air on the Jordan 1-6 is Nike's original version of the Jordan. putting the jumpman is like mj's version of the Jordan.
putting nikeair on a different retro colorway of a jordan that is not the original colorway made by Nike makes it look like Nike is trying hard to sell its symbol or logo over the jumpman symbol or logo.
this would be interesting if jumpmans existed before the nikeair swoosh logo was on jordans.
I think the original intent was to market the Jordans with the Air Jordan logo only. But because visible air was relatively new when Jordan 3 initially came out, so they stuck with putting Nike AIR on the back of the shoes.nikeair belongs on og type shoes. it looks the best.
but when you start putting it on non ogs or different new retros it kinda makes the branding of the nikeair swoosh logo less "original" or "special"
basically meaning that Nike air on the Jordan 1-6 is Nike's original version of the Jordan. putting the jumpman is like mj's version of the Jordan.
putting nikeair on a different retro colorway of a jordan that is not the original colorway made by Nike makes it look like Nike is trying hard to sell its symbol or logo over the jumpman symbol or logo.
this would be interesting if jumpmans existed before the nikeair swoosh logo was on jordans.
You're right, i would at least.
Eh, lets be honest, even if these released with a Jumpman instead of that NA everyone would jump on them anyway because its such a beloved colorway. You can lie to us, but you cant lie to yourself.