- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
I am not on here nearly as much as I was in the past. When did the Admin/Mods start allowing these?
Player A > Player B threads?
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by DownByLaw,
- Start date
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
I am not on here nearly as much as I was in the past. When did the Admin/Mods start allowing these?
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 54,463
- 43,617
Which ones are you referring to?
And topics like "Who will be sent to the All Star Game? Lamarcus or Kevin?" aren't 'Player A > Player B'
And topics like "Who will be sent to the All Star Game? Lamarcus or Kevin?" aren't 'Player A > Player B'
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 54,463
- 43,617
Which ones are you referring to?
And topics like "Who will be sent to the All Star Game? Lamarcus or Kevin?" aren't 'Player A > Player B'
And topics like "Who will be sent to the All Star Game? Lamarcus or Kevin?" aren't 'Player A > Player B'
- Jan 9, 2007
- 2,631
- 11
I think he's referring to the Wilt vs. Bill Russell thread.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
- Jan 9, 2007
- 2,631
- 11
I think he's referring to the Wilt vs. Bill Russell thread.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
yoppa guevara
Banned
- Jan 30, 2011
- 955
- 10
jordan/kobe was the reason followed by kobe/bron
yoppa guevara
Banned
- Jan 30, 2011
- 955
- 10
jordan/kobe was the reason followed by kobe/bron
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
- Apr 22, 2010
- 4,837
- 215
Player 99 > Player A >>>>>>> Player B
- Apr 22, 2010
- 4,837
- 215
Player 99 > Player A >>>>>>> Player B
- Jan 9, 2007
- 2,631
- 11
Kobe/Bron got way out of hand. Like that's all dudes talked about.
- Jan 9, 2007
- 2,631
- 11
Kobe/Bron got way out of hand. Like that's all dudes talked about.
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 112,330
- 59,258
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 54,463
- 43,617
FIRST B0RN:
North Dade Represent:
I think he's referring to the Wilt vs. Bill Russell thread.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
Gotcha.
Yeah, I've said from the beginning that the main focus for that rule was the inability to maturely discuss Jordan vs. Kobe, then Kobe vs. LeBron.
Other comparisons were less volatile and immature, so they were/are more accepted by staff. We generally just keep track of the thread, see how it's going before shutting it down. But a Kobe/LeBron/JOrdan thread? Just shut that down from the jump.No point in even entertaining the possibility that it will go smooth.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 112,330
- 59,258
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 54,463
- 43,617
FIRST B0RN:
North Dade Represent:
I think he's referring to the Wilt vs. Bill Russell thread.
I'd let that slide because it's more of a historical discussion that is not likely affected by fanboys/Stans ready to fight over some dumb argument.
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
Gotcha.
Yeah, I've said from the beginning that the main focus for that rule was the inability to maturely discuss Jordan vs. Kobe, then Kobe vs. LeBron.
Other comparisons were less volatile and immature, so they were/are more accepted by staff. We generally just keep track of the thread, see how it's going before shutting it down. But a Kobe/LeBron/JOrdan thread? Just shut that down from the jump.No point in even entertaining the possibility that it will go smooth.
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
Gotcha.
Yeah, I've said from the beginning that the main focus for that rule was the inability to maturely discuss Jordan vs. Kobe, then Kobe vs. LeBron.
Other comparisons were less volatile and immature, so they were/are more accepted by staff. We generally just keep track of the thread, see how it's going before shutting it down. But a Kobe/LeBron/JOrdan thread? Just shut that down from the jump.
Sounds good, thanks for clearing that up.
- Dec 17, 2003
- 9,530
- 91
That was the topic that caught my eye ska, there have some been some other one's as well in the past few weeks.
Gotcha.
Yeah, I've said from the beginning that the main focus for that rule was the inability to maturely discuss Jordan vs. Kobe, then Kobe vs. LeBron.
Other comparisons were less volatile and immature, so they were/are more accepted by staff. We generally just keep track of the thread, see how it's going before shutting it down. But a Kobe/LeBron/JOrdan thread? Just shut that down from the jump.
Sounds good, thanks for clearing that up.
- Feb 6, 2007
- 76,703
- 36,960
Gotta admit tho, last couple years we had a real solid 15 page SG thread, and some decent pages of Bron and Kobe and Mike.
- Feb 6, 2007
- 76,703
- 36,960
Gotta admit tho, last couple years we had a real solid 15 page SG thread, and some decent pages of Bron and Kobe and Mike.
- Sep 1, 2004
- 25,607
- 748
Ol Niketalk23 of the s&t board
Similar threads
