- Apr 22, 2006
- 2,110
- 120
Yeah i know these cameras are old but i was wondering if anyone knows where to get cheap polaroid 600 film?
Any help is appreciated thanks.
Any help is appreciated thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by TannerVon
True...check ebay and amazon
9/10 times its rich hipsters, paying extra for a 'vintage' looking picture. you can take a picture nowadays, and send it immediately tothe interwebs....why would anyone want to take a picture with some low def, slow developing tiny crappy film? its 2009, its time to step your diddy boppin up.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Iansmk
i hate people that use these cameras
?
Nah ... most of the time film just looks better .Originally Posted by Iansmk
9/10 times its rich hipsters, paying extra for a 'vintage' looking picture. you can take a picture nowadays, and send it immediately to the interwebs....why would anyone want to take a picture with some low def, slow developing tiny crappy film? its 2009, its time to step your diddy boppin up.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Iansmk
i hate people that use these cameras
?
![]()
There's so many damn types and chemical formulas of film out there.Originally Posted by Chi ILL
Nah ... most of the time film just looks better .Originally Posted by Iansmk
9/10 times its rich hipsters, paying extra for a 'vintage' looking picture. you can take a picture nowadays, and send it immediately to the interwebs....why would anyone want to take a picture with some low def, slow developing tiny crappy film? its 2009, its time to step your diddy boppin up.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Iansmk
i hate people that use these cameras
?
![]()
![]()
?Originally Posted by Forgot About Jae
There's so many damn types and chemical formulas of film out there.Originally Posted by Chi ILL
Nah ... most of the time film just looks better .Originally Posted by Iansmk
9/10 times its rich hipsters, paying extra for a 'vintage' looking picture. you can take a picture nowadays, and send it immediately to the interwebs....why would anyone want to take a picture with some low def, slow developing tiny crappy film? its 2009, its time to step your diddy boppin up.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Iansmk
i hate people that use these cameras
?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you comin outta nowhere with this 'film looks better' BSOriginally Posted by Chi ILL
?Originally Posted by Forgot About Jae
There's so many damn types and chemical formulas of film out there.Originally Posted by Chi ILL
Nah ... most of the time film just looks better .Originally Posted by Iansmk
9/10 times its rich hipsters, paying extra for a 'vintage' looking picture. you can take a picture nowadays, and send it immediately to the interwebs....why would anyone want to take a picture with some low def, slow developing tiny crappy film? its 2009, its time to step your diddy boppin up.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Iansmk
i hate people that use these cameras
?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally Posted by Forgot About Jae
dont get me wrong. plenty of pros use film but they're meeting a certain aesthetic by doing so..and the amateurs who use crappy toy cameras like holgas, lomos, polaroids are using graininess and overall crappy/blurry focus as a way to say it's "artistic"
Originally Posted by Yan Can Cook
![]()
![]()
Polaroids> you