- Jul 1, 2008
- 3,095
- 42
he should be locked up at arkham asylum insteadOriginally Posted by mixednuts
Kanye should be performing the joker in next batman movie...haha i think he fits that character lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he should be locked up at arkham asylum insteadOriginally Posted by mixednuts
Kanye should be performing the joker in next batman movie...haha i think he fits that character lol
Originally Posted by RFX45
Originally Posted by RavageBX
Ditto. I don't usually do this but I absolutely need some info on Ye's trench.Originally Posted by Falcon4567
I'm much more intrigued with the blackwatch plaid trench Kanye has on, I'd love to get something like that.Originally Posted by houstonsnk
Not bad. Not for me though.Originally Posted by quik1987
Boat shoes
Originally Posted by The Jersey Shirt
I dunno, I really ddin't even wanna speak on it, but after literally seeing 8 pages about these Kanye joints I just gotta say something
basically all the joints except the boat shoe joints and the pair just posted by RFX are just 100% trash and aren't even really worth going in to detail on.
First I like the LV/Kanye boat shoes, and I hate boat shoes. I like them because they put an interesting seemingly original spin on boat shoes. They literally have a White on White AF1 flair which I think is dope because who has eevr seen that before. maybe one of you can spend some extra time and google and try to prove that wrong, but in all seriousness the world has never seen someone REALLY freak out boat shoes in that way. The concept and follow through on those work.
The last pair that will probably be the best selling and most popular because they actually slook like regular sneakers which can be worn regularly are just TRASH. Honestly the look like a pair of DC SHOES, literally. Like they just took a pair of DCs, I don't feel like findng the exact style, and made them monotone so no one could say they are loud, removed the branding, and sewed on an LV tag. Like I was dumb cool with the assistant to the head of global projects at DC from like 2004-2007, and they Tried to give me those joints like 100 times and I was just like "no thanks" because they were just lame.
Its not like other designer shoes that are cool because they took an obviously classic sneaker and put their twist on it as an omage; instead it litrally taking a shoe you thought no one would recognize and trying to front like you made something new and great. Maybe it wasn't intentional but even then, your "super amazing kanye creativeness" combined with the oh so wonderful LV "200 years of fashion heritage" still couldnt come up with anything better then some straight up knock off DC SHOES? damn lil buddies
honestly if you took the LV patch off the tongue of them joints and sanded down the little logos they would have been gettin called "skips". if they posted em o complex unbranded with the tag "hottest sneaker of 2009" we'd be reading 80 posts here %!!**+%% on comlpex.
bottom line you can't attribute none of that pretend snob logic people use for liking designer stuff to those shoes and not be lying.
Originally Posted by RFX45
These are simple enough to be decent but damn I vowed to myself not to buy another all black shoe this year other than the Gucci slip-ons.
It's not a specific brand it's a cut. They are tapered at the bottom. Most commonly on the "skinny" jean cut. But there are sumslim cuts that have the same taper. Ur best bet is Levi or Cheap Monday. U can also try sum more expensive brands like Nudie or ImperialOriginally Posted by arson09
Alright, can someone inform me on what companys make these kind of jeans with the smaller leg openings? Ever pair of jeans i come across drag under my shoes/sneakers. I've noticed a few fellow NT'ers with similar jeans as well. Most likely will have to be a brand sold online since i don't really have a lot of access to the same kind of brands as you guys(South Jersey).
sidebars, just because people hype kanye doesn't mean hes as fashionable as its claimed. i dont care who $%%#! with ihm all that is justsales and marketing for money.Originally Posted by RFX45
Originally Posted by The Jersey Shirt
I dunno, I really ddin't even wanna speak on it, but after literally seeing 8 pages about these Kanye joints I just gotta say something
basically all the joints except the boat shoe joints and the pair just posted by RFX are just 100% trash and aren't even really worth going in to detail on.
First I like the LV/Kanye boat shoes, and I hate boat shoes. I like them because they put an interesting seemingly original spin on boat shoes. They literally have a White on White AF1 flair which I think is dope because who has eevr seen that before. maybe one of you can spend some extra time and google and try to prove that wrong, but in all seriousness the world has never seen someone REALLY freak out boat shoes in that way. The concept and follow through on those work.
The last pair that will probably be the best selling and most popular because they actually slook like regular sneakers which can be worn regularly are just TRASH. Honestly the look like a pair of DC SHOES, literally. Like they just took a pair of DCs, I don't feel like findng the exact style, and made them monotone so no one could say they are loud, removed the branding, and sewed on an LV tag. Like I was dumb cool with the assistant to the head of global projects at DC from like 2004-2007, and they Tried to give me those joints like 100 times and I was just like "no thanks" because they were just lame.
Its not like other designer shoes that are cool because they took an obviously classic sneaker and put their twist on it as an omage; instead it litrally taking a shoe you thought no one would recognize and trying to front like you made something new and great. Maybe it wasn't intentional but even then, your "super amazing kanye creativeness" combined with the oh so wonderful LV "200 years of fashion heritage" still couldnt come up with anything better then some straight up knock off DC SHOES? damn lil buddies
honestly if you took the LV patch off the tongue of them joints and sanded down the little logos they would have been gettin called "skips". if they posted em o complex unbranded with the tag "hottest sneaker of 2009" we'd be reading 80 posts here %!!**+%% on comlpex.
bottom line you can't attribute none of that pretend snob logic people use for liking designer stuff to those shoes and not be lying.
I think your going a bit too harsh on them and that is coming from someone who does not like these set of shoes either. It's been filled with Kanye's LV shoes for a couple of pages because that is pretty much what is going on right now. However, that is beside the point. Just to get it out of the way, I think originality is really not osmethign you could look for in a shoe anymore. Everything has practically been done and when it comes to casual shoes like these, simplicity is key and the originality has to come from the little details, whether it's that little patch of suede or even the three LV logo on the midsole, it's those details that will carry these shoes and make them unique. Of course, depends on the demographic that it will be judged on will make it look good or bad.
I hear you, ut I just gotta disagree. If your little details are basically SHAMELESS BRANDING, as they are on those shoes, it shoes a LACK of creativity and interestingness. If those details were about the details and not the branding they wouldn't have been so oversized and shameless, or they would have been deails that were non-branding related.
the last thing you said i the ENTIRE route of the problem. It "depends on the demographic that it will be judged on"? i know thats how it goes, b thats what makes it al BULL !%+*. If Jim Jones wore the black ones with a black V neck they not classy. Kanye wears em with a black tiht fit polo shirt they are ground breaking. All parties that will wnid up wearing these shoes are wearing them just because they are LV. The statement I gauruntee eevryone is really making in these shoes is "these are some super basic sneakers that are so similar to everything out I can wear them where ever but they are a million times cooler because they are LV" Its the same ideaology people hate on Jim JOnes, Hate on TI, hate on these urban one or that urban one for. its ******ed and it applies to 99% of the consumers we see with this stuff. it a producfts fashionablness is being judged by the demgraphic wearing it above the garment itself, then people are really just findnig a cute way to hate on a group on people. Its just nonsense. kanye wears a Gucci jacket with blk/blk AJ5s and its amazing, LIL wayne rocks a gucci jacket with the gucci duck boots frmo a few years ago and is trashy. its makes no sense, both parties are literaly just promoted the name, just one demogrphic triesto use the fashion aspect to judge th other.
and as far as originality goes eah eevrythingsbeen done, the key to fashion it doing its better, without ust shameless branding, or matching shameless branding with that type of advancement to make it better. If that shoe had details they made people want em without those logos thats special, because if yall are buying a style. But every one here has said it its all about the branding and its just WILD hypocritical. how can peple hate on supras and then turn around and buy LVs that you say look like em?
The boat shoes, I really do not like them and not really sure what is AF1-esque in them? Is it the thick midsole? When I first saw the boat shoes, it reminded me immediately thought of the Vans boat shoes "Low Pressure" or some Sperry Topsider. It is the typical boat shoes with a thicker midsole, the same as the Vans and then he put tassles on the end of the laces which makes it drag longer and thent he huge cushion in the back just messed up the sole. With that extra back detail, it turned the boad shoes, a seim-casula shoe to a casual sneaker.
AF1 qualities= OUTDATEDLY BULKY UPPER, SHINY WHITE LEATHER, BULKLY MIDSOLE, ATHLETIC INSPIRED HEEL PADDING.
The shoe literaly looks like a Sperry *#+@%* an AF1, and the shoe is ground breaking and interesting because of that. Even the tassles have a quality that looks like how the AF1s do when you tie em with the sloppy boes. THATS AMAZING. Ofcourse they look like boatshoes, but what BOAT SHOES look like them really? people always claiming class talk about these small details, well what I'm saying is them things have the deatails. Find me an all white shiny leather boat shoe. Find me a bulky soled boat shoe, Find me and boat shoe with althetic inspired heel pading.
its whatever I already see how its gonna play. Everyone gonna play is safe and cope the DC/supras so for a month everyone can KNOW they LVs and then ater they see a million rappers with em who bought em the same day as you, and be all mad. the someone gonna murder the boat shoes and rock em in a way with a fit that reminds people why WHITE/White AF1s were hot and they gonna start fiending saying DAMN I COULDA did that. People are gonna see it so simple and swaggy and versitle that they gonn kick themselves I'm happy to sit back and watch because i already see it, those will wind up benig cross the board hot because they have originality paired with classicness, paired with great branding, they aren't missing a component
The midtops, although simple, really had the biggest upside that it is simple. To be honest, take out the LV logo and the back cushion and I would think it is some Supra's. But again, it is the small details that make it look good. Kind of like the Gucci chucks, they add a wingtip and the monogram (subtle monogram).
enh the gucci chucks are another one, its like that exact ziper leather chuck has been done before. they just thrw on a monogram bcause they knew it would sell because label mongers will fnd a way to force that msage subtle or not. Those style kicks have been out for DUMBlong with no change minus the mogram
But liek I said, it willr eally depend on the person. If I really had to pick one from all I've seen, I'd pick the mid-tops or the one with the straps if it came in a black colorway. Of course we will pay for the name itself, i think that is no secret especially in this thread.
its no sercet, but it a overshadowed, rarely eevr admitied, auelydisguised truth. That why I could neevr really hate on cats wearing the stuff urban but classy, because atleast they being all the way upfrnot about it
So I really can't blame kanye or these designer brands for copying or "paying homage" to the classic shoes, just wish that the amount of money paid is worth the name and quality and hopefully, the design. If you look at it, originality has given us some god awful shoes from the likes of Y-3, DSquared and D&G where they just go over the top with the design and colors that simplicty takes a back seat and it just fails miserably. With the Kanye's shoes, I wouldn't say he failed miserably but it had potential and that the color and details on his shoes just didn't do it for me, but it might be nice and well worth to the next person.
some of them shoes suck just like everyone elses, but they go harder with the originality because thee branding is less respected as always though I never mnid going point for point with you R, good talk