- 28,172
- 52,937
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
\\ Post Your Car vol. Been a minute //
- 1,248
- 630
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2016
"You can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink it"
What if your about to give your lady a ride and he whips it out?
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
You gotta maintain the hooves too don’t forget. You might get kicked in the jaw while doing it but go on
- 49,029
- 61,328
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- 7,448
- 3,041
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- 1,248
- 630
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2016
1100 for how much of a gain?
- 7,448
- 3,041
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
Stage 1 - +45 HP / +50 FT LB-TQ
- Performance Software Precisely Engineered to Run on a Completely Stock Car.
- For 91 octane fuel
- For 91 octane fuel
- For 93 octane fuel
- For 91 octane fuel
- For 93 octane fuel
- Required Hardware for Stage 2
- Upgraded Downpipe
- Recommended Hardware
- Cold Air Intake or Short Ram
- Cat Back Exhaust System
- Ignition Timing Precisely Calibrated for 93 Octane Fuel
- Precisely Calibrated for an Upgraded Exhaust System
- Optimized for a High Flow Catalytic Converter
Last edited:
- 2,742
- 5,306
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
I have owned a 3.6, 5.7 and just got a 6.4 ( all challengers) scat pack a month ago. There is a huge difference between the 5.7 and 6.4. If you chose a challenger; make sure it has suede or reg leather seats as some have cloth. Car seats dont fit very well in a challenger(rear facing for newborns). I had a friend that had to trade his in for a family car. I got my scat pack for over $6000 off of sitcker price. The only thing i like about the charger is 4 doors and comes standard with remote start; but i cant sacrifice looks for those options.
Last edited:
- 609
- 144
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
So 6.4 is the way to go got it. I'm actually surprised because I kno a lot of people satisfied with the 5.7 but I'm sure it all depends on your price budget and if you can afford one.
- 63,609
- 50,737
- Joined
- May 23, 2005
They satisfied
Because they don’t know any better
Test drive em
Then you’ll see what we mean
I went to the dealership couldn’t decide
On a rt or scat
Started up the rt
Startup up was trash
Sounded like my 2012 impala
Drive around
Didn’t get pulled back in my seat
But when I started up that scat pack
Bruh
I instantly smiled
I still smile starting it up
2 years later
But
Test drive then decide
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
I’m thinking of getting a KTuner for my Si. The base map gains about 35 hp and 55 ft lbs. only $450
- 7,448
- 3,041
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
Cop it so we can race
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
I wanted to wait at least a couple years until I start really modding just cause of the warranty but I think I’m gonna just do itCop it so we can race
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
Damn for $1100 I can get the KTuner with the Downpipe/front pipe combo and the stage 2 vittuned tune which makes +80 hp and +120 tq
Why the vw so expensive to tune?
Why the vw so expensive to tune?
- 7,448
- 3,041
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
There’s a transmission tune (for the DSG) that’s 400. The regular tune is only 500, but the module that I want with the tune is 700 cause it’ll let me do more for a custom tune.
- 6,054
- 14,049
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
That's awesome brother! Keep us updated on how it all goe's. You're going to the Babylon shop? Or the new one that's a little further out? I have some plan's too for my Scat Shaker...but I'm under warranty till 2023 so I'm patiently waiting.
- 6,054
- 14,049
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
If budget allow's get that 6.4 hemi bro...you will NOT regret it. My boy bought a 5.7 R/T Charger and then he drove my 6.4 Scat Pack Shaker and instantly said they're 2 different car's because of engine size & power. IF you're looking for practicality then get the Charger for the 4 door's, if you want a brute, wide, heavy powerful muscle car with retro vibe's & look's then look no further then the 6.4 Scat Pack/Shaker, Daytona 392, SRT 392. Let us know what you go with
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
- 1,248
- 630
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2016
Id rather get a mustang gt over the rt. Last time i checked they were faster than a srt also something to test drive if you see one. But for the price of a new rt or 5.0 you can get an older zl1 with low miles
- 63,609
- 50,737
- Joined
- May 23, 2005
Id rather get a mustang gt over the rt. Last time i checked they were faster than a srt also something to test drive if you see one. But for the price of a new rt or 5.0 you can get an older zl1 with low miles
I’ve smoked
So many gt’s
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
Back in 2014 the 5.0 was faster than the srt8. Not sure if that still applies but I’m sure they’re pretty similar. I always thought it was funny that not even the top trim challenger could beat a gt. Take the gt500 out and it’s not even fairId rather get a mustang gt over the rt. Last time i checked they were faster than a srt also something to test drive if you see one. But for the price of a new rt or 5.0 you can get an older zl1 with low miles
- 3,270
- 1,551
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
Yea that's a weird choice. I mean chrome trim was pretty big in the 2000s, but auto makers are finally moving away from it now. It'll look much betterYeah man I’m about to do the same with mine. Idk why Honda gave the Si black grill and other black trim but left the window trim chromeso that’s what I’ll be doing soon too
- 63,609
- 50,737
- Joined
- May 23, 2005
I mean the mustang is waaaay lighter
What u expected
But It can beat it now
Better respect it
- 3,640
- 1,946
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
I’m saying since they’re direct competitors.
Actually the 2018 5.0 is now as fast as the scat if not faster
- 22,235
- 10,972
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
Do the 6.4. Even if you have to wait and save a little more.
