- Oct 15, 2008
- 10,857
- 67
why is it that these are like the only jordans that still says nike on them? or is there others retro/cdp that say nike on them? why cant they just keepputting nike on other retro/cdp jordans when they still do to the 2s?
question about the cdp 2s
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by hugo,
- Start date
- Oct 24, 2006
- 2,526
- 15
Its all a scam.
- Dec 19, 2007
- 8,002
- 2,422
The charity 2s had a jumpman on them if that matters.
- Nov 20, 2008
- 35
- 10
ugly shoes nI do not see what yall see in them
- Jul 3, 2008
- 241
- 10
I ask myself that everyday
- Oct 1, 2008
- 5,483
- 19
^^^^
What he said. Man, JB be playing games with us yo.
What he said. Man, JB be playing games with us yo.
- Aug 14, 2008
- 1,148
- 17
there showing us that they can still put nike on shoes they just choose not to with our favorites like the 3,4,5,and 6. there basically slapping us in the face
- Mar 1, 2008
- 264
- 10
damnit JB I hate YOU
- Dec 31, 2008
- 722
- 13
i wish we know
but the 2's are one of my favorite kicks and im glad they dropped the white/red colorway
but the 2's are one of my favorite kicks and im glad they dropped the white/red colorway
- May 22, 2008
- 2,165
- 11
Originally Posted by Xnyles
I ask myself that everyday
- Oct 27, 2006
- 338
- 10
in before lock
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,740
At first JB says, No nike on Jordan shoes to protect OG collectors....
so hmm....how about we slap NIKE on one of the most OLDEST Air Jordan models and just kill the heart of the loyalist customers.
The Jordan 2 was considered a failure in Nike's & JBs mind. Mike hated them...
SO why mess up a classic 'again' by replacing NIKE with a symbol? They keep NIKE and everybodys happy..
so hmm....how about we slap NIKE on one of the most OLDEST Air Jordan models and just kill the heart of the loyalist customers.
The Jordan 2 was considered a failure in Nike's & JBs mind. Mike hated them...
SO why mess up a classic 'again' by replacing NIKE with a symbol? They keep NIKE and everybodys happy..
- Oct 15, 2008
- 10,857
- 67
thanx 4 the info
- May 5, 2007
- 540
- 10
VERY NICE
Mactastic4167
formerly mac4167
- Nov 15, 2008
- 5,910
- 1,025
i never took the time to find out myself, ive asked myself this over a thousand times.
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,191
- 1,141
The 2's are not as bad as people make them out to be. I actually think the 2's are smooth but it does defy logic as to why JB would only put a NIKE onthe back of the 2's but not any of the more revered models.
- Feb 19, 2003
- 494
- 141
well, all the 1's have swooshes on the side and say Nike (on the bottom of the sole)
- Jan 18, 2004
- 2,039
- 3,391
The best line I hear on this board atleast once a month is that JB has to pay Nike Royalties to use it.
- Jan 28, 2008
- 281
- 10
I think the IIs would like very strange without NIKE on them. The others can pass, but not these.
- Nov 10, 2007
- 700
- 10
^^ The jumpman actually doesn't look that awkward on the doernbecher II's but still. This is a good question
- Jan 19, 2008
- 51
- 10
It says nike, not nike air the fusions 12's and 5's said nike air on them as well. JB is playing games with us.
- Oct 15, 2008
- 10,857
- 67
Originally Posted by 3thaman
The best line I hear on this board atleast once a month is that JB has to pay Nike Royalties to use it.
- Nov 10, 2007
- 2,027
- 72
I don't know, a way for Jordan brand not to anger the collectors. If youre going to retro something, keep it the same. No offense guys.
- Sep 16, 2008
- 1,310
- 70
who knows why jb does the things they do. the whole nike vs. jumpman argument don't matter to me. the og colorway was a must for the rotation!
- Apr 12, 2008
- 382
- 14
The IIs are beatiful. Def one of my Favs.
