retro 12 OG

[aj1223]

I about to buy these OG retro 12s from '97. a couple things dont sit right with me and i wanted a second opinion. The 23 in the back looks weird. the side of the sole where the "rivets" on the sole underneath where it says jumpman look weird too. i know they have been worn but you cant even see them.

 everything else seems fine. what do you guys think?

 

[aj1223]

anybody?

 

[aj1223]

more pics. legit?

 

[aj1223]

nobody?

 

[timmybrixxx]

post a pic of the size tag and CF on the bottom.. the 97' is the OG not a retro, 1st retro was 03'.. I need to see the dates to determine which one you have here but im thinkin these are indeed the OGs..You can tell by the transparency of the red outsole the 03' retro was more opaque.... IMO they look legit to me as well.. They just show their age..

 

[aj1223]

its not a retro. it is the original. i am just so used to putting the word retro in front of the model that i did it when i made the title. i am going back and forth with a guy to buy these and he said he will send me a picture of the tag tonight. can anyone give me a price check on these too. they come with original box