- 25,458
- 644
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
once i read what dude posted i knew u would be in this thread talking about it
Rodney Stuckey = {()}
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by lnmymind,
- Start date
once i read what dude posted i knew u would be in this thread talking about it
- 431
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
I also believe that Stuckey would beat AI in 1v1.
- 14,133
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
LOL.
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
On ESPN it says #0.
- 6,376
- 433
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
It's #1.
He just had his press conference.
He just had his press conference.
- 1,482
- 157
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
Stuckey should give up that 3 to Allen Iverson. That's like MJ going to the Wizards and some youngin said I'm keeping 23...please! Stuckey needs torock 1 or 8.
- 1,482
- 157
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
I can live with #1 AI will honor it well C. Billups
- 11,114
- 3,728
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
Didnt he wore #6 in a all star game? ...forgot what year was it? 03?
- 4,751
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
mateen cleaves
Banned
- 10,196
- 12
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
hes gonna be a starOriginally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
- 4,266
- 400
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2004
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Yall really think Stuckey is the future of that franchise?
I mean idk how he's not, kid can play flat out.
- 10,056
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
He's a combo guard....how many times we gota go down that road..
not saying he won't be good...but for 'the guy' of a franchise...no.
not saying he won't be good...but for 'the guy' of a franchise...no.
- 43,490
- 8,354
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
Don't mind Allen...There's just certain players in the L that he hates....Stuck is one...
Melo is another
Melo is another
- 3,347
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2007
'02
- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
darthska
Staff member
- 44,039
- 27,581
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Clutchshooter:at people goin nuts because it might be 23.
'he's wearing 3: 'nah pass'
'i mean 23: 'im gonna frame it!!!!!!'.
because the very number 23 itself is soooooo special right?
"noooooo it's what it meeeeaaaaannnss. it's magical!!!!!"
and numbers arent actually just intended for easy differentiation between players for refs correct?.
hypebeasting in full force.
Almost every time you post something critical, I feel better about myself, because I tend to take things too literally. I try to be more abstract,to loosen up and what not. Then I see you make a reply like that one and I feel better knowing that no matter how literal I take things, there's at leastone other person on the board less abstract and more literal (read: 'no fun') than me.
Dude, if someone even THOUGHT about wearing #32 for the Lakers, I'd riot.Nevermind that it's retired; no one should even think it.
No, it's not just a number.
#23 is no longer just a number in basketball.
Sorry.
It's just not.
It's not mystical, magical, or anything foolish... but it does have a more significant meaning than just being a 2 and a 3.
- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
Almost every time you post something critical, I feel better about myself, because I tend to take things too literally. I try to be more abstract, to loosen up and what not. Then I see you make a reply like that one and I feel better knowing that no matter how literal I take things, there's at least one other person on the board less abstract and more literal (read: 'no fun') than me.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Clutchshooter:at people goin nuts because it might be 23.
'he's wearing 3: 'nah pass'
'i mean 23: 'im gonna frame it!!!!!!'.
because the very number 23 itself is soooooo special right?
"noooooo it's what it meeeeaaaaannnss. it's magical!!!!!"
and numbers arent actually just intended for easy differentiation between players for refs correct?.
hypebeasting in full force.
Dude, if someone even THOUGHT about wearing #32 for the Lakers, I'd riot.
No, it's not just a number.
#23 is no longer just a number in basketball.
Sorry.
It's just not.
It's not mystical, magical, or anything foolish... but it does have a more significant meaning than just being a 2 and a 3.
Jesus H. Christ....you two should just go spoon somewhere.
- 410
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- 1,834
- 521
- Joined
- Dec 29, 1999
Iverson is the REASON Stuckey is wearing number three anyway. He made that number popular. Nobody was rocking number three
like that before Iverson. Out of respect he needs to give that number up. You know Iverson is going to pay him. Besides, Iverson might not be there for long,Stuckey can get the number back when/if he leaves.
like that before Iverson. Out of respect he needs to give that number up. You know Iverson is going to pay him. Besides, Iverson might not be there for long,Stuckey can get the number back when/if he leaves.
- 753
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
i guess i need to get use to seeing iverson wearing #1... its gonna be wierd...
trueblack88
Banned
- 707
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
Exactly. I totally agree with this. To me, its not even THAT serious but its just a respect-type issue...
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,842
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
Wow.. 23? How corny is that? Probably asked some hypebeast he met on the street what number he should wear.
- 3,405
- 120
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2007
Interesting... Iverson wearing #1?
- 11,114
- 3,728
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
Originally Posted by daprescription
.
Yup, thats the one...