SAT's

il

Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
347
Reaction score
10
My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?
 
My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?
 
i don't see how the SAT measures your income or ability to pay for college. what reasoning did he give for that?

i thought the SAT was stupid just because it was basically an endurance test. in what situation would i ever be taking a standardized test for 4 hours?
 
i don't see how the SAT measures your income or ability to pay for college. what reasoning did he give for that?

i thought the SAT was stupid just because it was basically an endurance test. in what situation would i ever be taking a standardized test for 4 hours?
 
SAT's measure your ability to do math, reading comprehension, and writing on a college level.
How do they measure your income? The SAT's i took didn't come with a W2.
 
SAT's measure your ability to do math, reading comprehension, and writing on a college level.
How do they measure your income? The SAT's i took didn't come with a W2.
 
I don't remember exactly what he said. It's probably not the SAT's then. Maybe someone has heard of something similar before?
 
I don't remember exactly what he said. It's probably not the SAT's then. Maybe someone has heard of something similar before?
 
Originally Posted by Il

My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?

I sort of agree. It measures your income based on if you were able to pay 2k for a class, which means you're more than willing to pay 50k a year for a mediocre education. I know when I did SAT prep I didn't pay but did sort of well (1980). All my friends who paid all did amazingly well (2100+). 
 
Originally Posted by Il

My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?

I sort of agree. It measures your income based on if you were able to pay 2k for a class, which means you're more than willing to pay 50k a year for a mediocre education. I know when I did SAT prep I didn't pay but did sort of well (1980). All my friends who paid all did amazingly well (2100+). 
 
Kids who can afford to pay for private school/living in a good public school district/SAT prep classes score higher.

I think that's what your prof is getting at.
 
Kids who can afford to pay for private school/living in a good public school district/SAT prep classes score higher.

I think that's what your prof is getting at.
 
Originally Posted by Toy Collector123

Originally Posted by Il

My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?

I sort of agree. It measures your income based on if you were able to pay 2k for a class, which means you're more than willing to pay 50k a year for a mediocre education. I know when I did SAT prep I didn't pay but did sort of well (1980). All my friends who paid all did amazingly well (2100+). 
Paying doesn't guarantee high scores though
 
Originally Posted by Toy Collector123

Originally Posted by Il

My sociology professor said that the SAT's don't measure your intelligence but your income and ability to pay for college. Or something like that. What do you think?

I sort of agree. It measures your income based on if you were able to pay 2k for a class, which means you're more than willing to pay 50k a year for a mediocre education. I know when I did SAT prep I didn't pay but did sort of well (1980). All my friends who paid all did amazingly well (2100+). 
Paying doesn't guarantee high scores though
 
Back
Top Bottom