Do you mean "equal" in terms of equal opportunity, or in terms of equal abilities/traits/personality/etc.?
I was originally assuming equal opportunity in my first post, but yea, that term also needs to be clarified.
Well here's the thing. I'm all about progress, and I hate it when people say that we're "never going to see the end of racism" (or sexism or whatever) but at the end of the day I don't think we're ever going to see TRUE equal opportunity.
Speaking purely in an American context, even if we do away with racism, some schools are going to be better than others, some areas are going to be safer than others. This has more to do with the fact that a capitalist society HAS TO HAVE CLASSES OF PEOPLE. There will always be inner cities, there will always be affluent suburbs and there will always be families like the Rockefellers, Turners, etc who live on an entirely different plane from the rest of us.
The heart of true equal opportunity is establishing the most equal educational system that we possibly can. An area where the average household income is $200k/year is always going to be able to have better schools than an area where the average is $45k/year because there will be more tax money available for schools. To me education is the key, and til this is more equal, this whole concept of "equal opportunity" is just a pipe dream.
I definitely agree. I actually see capitalism as being the main contributer to this issue (and thus my first post about consumerism, etc.)
Just to clarify, when I said...
You bring up an important point: how does one define "equal?" That is important.
Do you mean "equal" in terms of equal opportunity, or in terms of equal abilities/traits/personality/etc.?
I was originally assuming equal opportunity in my first post, but yea, that term also needs to be clarified.
I was asking those questions to the thread-starter.