Shaq Has Made Inside The NBA Unwatchable.

Idc mann shaq is hilarious , "BBQ chicken" . Chucks the man tho js an all around cool dude , Kenny is the talkative one , and ej is the one tht holds everything together without him they'd js clown for an hour and probably not even talk about basketball .
 
Last edited:
Shaq went IN on Kendrick Perkins the other night
laugh.gif


His David Aldridge impersonation had me dying too.
I need more out of the GREAT Kendrick Perkins

roll.gif
roll.gif
 
I'll admit it the only thing i think is funny comin from Shaq is when he says either

"Birdman, Birdman"

or

"Hawt Hawt Hawt Hawt Hawt"
 
This is incredibly ironic, because I agree, and what's sad is, I attribute most of Shaq's popularity and success in the NBA to the fact that he was so entertaining.

Let's not get it twisted, if you really know basketball as a sport, you know that Shaq got "better" when he went to LA, but he was also allowed to just bulldoze through people in the post, which were offensive fouls 80% of the time.

When he was in college/Orlando, before he weighed 340 pounds, he was a great player, but notice, his teams weren't exactly blowing people away. His best year was during the Jordan half-season, and they got DESTROYED by Hakeem in the finals.

I could go on forever about this, I just think it's ironic that he's failing at being entertaining, the one reason he's had as much success as he's had to begin with.

Oh yeah, he's on Inside the NBA because people who don't really know sports, which probably makes up most of the viewers, like Shaq.
 
This is incredibly ironic, because I agree, and what's sad is, I attribute most of Shaq's popularity and success in the NBA to the fact that he was so entertaining.

Let's not get it twisted, if you really know basketball as a sport, you know that Shaq got "better" when he went to LA, but he was also allowed to just bulldoze through people in the post, which were offensive fouls 80% of the time.

When he was in college/Orlando, before he weighed 340 pounds, he was a great player, but notice, his teams weren't exactly blowing people away. His best year was during the Jordan half-season, and they got DESTROYED by Hakeem in the finals.

I could go on forever about this, I just think it's ironic that he's failing at being entertaining, the one reason he's had as much success as he's had to begin with.

Oh yeah, he's on Inside the NBA because people who don't really know sports, which probably makes up most of the viewers, like Shaq.

Completely disagree with this. Offensive fouls 80% of the time? I'll bet he was hacked and it was not called more times than he "bulldozed" someone and it wasn't called. Shaq is one of the most physically dominant players to ever play in the league and he got better in LA because he developed low post moves to go along with his superior power, unlike the current LA center. They were a young team in Orlando when they made the finals. Nick missing those four free throws and Houston subsequently hitting a three at the buzzer destroyed them mentally. All he needed was ONE free throw. I digress.
 
Who saw Shaqtin a foul? Dude has the hugest ego. Couldn't event take a joke when Chuck and Kenny poke fun at his missed haymaker. Chuck: Have you ever landed any of your punches?
 
I could go on forever about this, I just think it's ironic that he's failing at being entertaining, the one reason he's had as much success as he's had to begin with.

I think with Shaq, he's incredibly entertaining in small doses. Like when we used to see him during post game interviews/conferences or even the random pre/post practice interviews.

now that he's on TNT and he knows that camera is on for a long period of time, it's like he's forcing the humor.
 
No, he really didn't. He's more annoying than funny most of the time, but he's one of the biggest personalities the NBA has ever seen and he's trying to fit on a show with a well-established dynamic.

The show is still funny, he has his moments, and he's not going anywhere.
first part is too true

second part is unfortunately true too

his analysis is usually horrible tho, like for real this guy really isnt insightful at all, but then again you could argue Barkley is the same
 
first part is too true

second part is unfortunately true too

his analysis is usually horrible tho, like for real this guy really isnt insightful at all, but then again you could argue Barkley is the same

Difference is

Barkley sometimes doesn't know every player's name or stats, but he still provides insight and it's clear he watches enough basketball to have an opinion on it.

Shaq often doesn't know every player's name or stats, nor what they do. It's clear he doesn't watch a lot of NBA. His insight is pretty much things even non-NBA fans know. "Ray Allen can shoot." "Lebron WILL dunk on you."
 
Difference is

Barkley sometimes doesn't know every player's name or stats, but he still provides insight and it's clear he watches enough basketball to have an opinion on it.

Shaq often doesn't know every player's name or stats, nor what they do. It's clear he doesn't watch a lot of NBA. His insight is pretty much things even non-NBA fans know. "Ray Allen can shoot." "Lebron WILL dunk on you."
which is exactly why i said "it could be argued"

im totally on your side, as colloquial as Barkley is, his analysis is formulated imo

shaq is mad annoying, but hes not going anywhere
 
Back
Top Bottom