- Mar 5, 2005
- 23,970
- 15,727
Condolences to all of you guys in Vegas. For some odd reason, I never expected to see a mass shooting in Vegas, but now that I think about it, it's unfortunately a viable target since everyone is out all of the time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
23 guns found in his hotel room.
No idea. Reports also said house keeping made regular cleaning stops. They didn't notice anything unusual.Went from 8 to 16 and now 23.
Were the guns hidden all over the room?
No idea. Reports also said house keeping made regular cleaning stops. They didn't notice anything unusual.
Condolences to all of you guys in Vegas. For some odd reason, I never expected to see a mass shooting in Vegas, but now that I think about it, it's unfortunately a viable target since everyone is out all of the time.
No idea. Reports also said house keeping made regular cleaning stops. They didn't notice anything unusual.
They are being analyzed as we speakI’m surprised that no casino footage of this guy has been released. Like nothing from check in or even walking thru the casino Vegas is known for the eye in the sky.
From what I read, Las Vegas is a "convention city." So even if a housekeeper was to stumble upon some guns, it wouldn't even be out of the ordinary as firearms conventions occur regularly.
I don't understand it.
But crazy isn't to be understood.
’Gun shop owner who sold to Vegas shooter: ‘He was just a normal guy who walks into my door 50,000 times a day’
She is coming back to the states within the week. They said they will question upon return.Any Word On The Lady Who Fled? Are They Tracking Her Down For Questioning?
1. If you want to argue that, then the states or other non-federal group(s) should have equal firepower and organization to oppose the federal government, if need be. (You knew that's what this Amendment was about, right?) I don't really see the need to go down that road, but if you're pushing that point, that's where you end up.The 2nd Amendment is not an important freedom, not anymore. It's outdated and unnecessary.
The first half of the 2nd Amendment clearly states "in order to form a well regulated militia..."
1. We are nowhere near well regulated, and the current state of affairs is proof of that.
2. We have the largest army in the world by a huge margin, we don't need a civilian militia.
But people like to ignore the first half of the amendment and focus solely on the latter half.
If people want to own a handgun or hunting rifle that's fine by me, but stop hiding behind a constitutional amendment you don't understand.
Protection. Hunting. Recreation. I don't want to ever have to shoot another human being, but it is there to defend me and my family if our lives are ever threatened.What's the intended use of a gun?
"Oh, he resisted, so we had to shoot him... " Did y'all forget about BLM? You remember that police departments are governmental agencies, too, right?If Trump did that without any bias, I'd be 100% for it. Unfortunately he's a racist pig, so I don't trust him with the task of going into people's homes to confiscate weapons.
False. People have specifically listed various bans in this thread, either for all guns, limiting civilians to "only pistols and shotguns" (aka rifle ban), etc etc. Obv most people wanting more gun control want increased limitations rather than an outright ban, but you can't say some aren't wanting a ban.This is actually piss poor considering I doubt anyone is speaking of a ban, just brainstorming better regulation, and the legal, regulated industry is positively booming.
And that's the thing America is looking to hide, that murderous animal looks JUST LIKE a regular American.
The majority of this country looks just like him
Alright, getting caught up here-
1. If you want to argue that, then the states or other non-federal group(s) should have equal firepower and organization to oppose the federal government, if need be. (You knew that's what this Amendment was about, right?) I don't really see the need to go down that road, but if you're pushing that point, that's where you end up.
2. Only if we had zero standing army would we NOT need a civilian milita. I'm not a member of any militia, just pointing out why there's supposed to be one.
The 2nd Amendment wasn't written for personal protection OR hunting, though those are beneficial effects of it. It is there as a check against a tyrannical government. Again, I'm not saying any action needs to be taken like that right now, but if even "all rifles" are sacrificed in the name of "public safety", that would be a significant blow to that vital check/balance incorporated into the foundation of our country.
You're probably about to say "what can a rifle do against a country that has the most powerful military on earth?" I dunno, ask those guys in Afghanistan. They're still there after 9 years fighting the Soviets (also a strong military) and 15 years fighting us, using only rifles and improvised weapons. Obviously I hope it would never come to that, but having armed citizens is a crucial check to help prevent the government from overstepping their bounds, and keeping those kinds of situations from happening.
I understand and totally agree with the need for check and balances between the people and government, but that's not accomplished with guns. It's accomplished with words and democracy. To think otherwise is just ignorant.
And the 2nd Amendment, along with the rest of the Constitution, was left for interpretation for future generations. And if we, the future generation, see the 2nd Amendment as doing more harm then good, we have the Constitutional right to rewrite or repeal the amendment.