So two wrongs DO make a right!?

Eye for an eye.

Don't even give me that "makes the whole world blind"

How is punishing a criminal proportionally for a crime wrong ?
indifferent.gif
indifferent.gif
indifferent.gif
 
Originally Posted by daemacho

Originally Posted by philly5fan

wow dude said people should be put to death for robbery...wow
Yes.. these criminals have no respect for themselves or other people. No reason why they should be allowed back on the streets. I hate how gang life or acting "gangster" and doing crimes has been desensitized.. and we wonder why America has the highest rate of prisoners than any other country.
Your an idiot
laugh.gif
.
 
Originally Posted by daemacho

i think for crimes like murder, robbery, rape and molestation, criminals should be put to death. it would make other people think twice before breaking the law.


wow people get wrongfully accused for that !%%# EVERYDAY... INCLUDING ME thank god i didnt get guilty. so say someone who didn't do it but got accused ofit deserves to die??? man think a little more before you write somethin like that
 
Originally Posted by philly5fan

Originally Posted by daemacho

Originally Posted by philly5fan

wow dude said people should be put to death for robbery...wow
Yes.. these criminals have no respect for themselves or other people. No reason why they should be allowed back on the streets. I hate how gang life or acting "gangster" and doing crimes has been desensitized.. and we wonder why America has the highest rate of prisoners than any other country.


So say a man is in desperate need of money and he robs a store with a fake weapon, doesnt harm anyone, and takes money from a company thats grossing millions a year, he should be killed?? Rapists and serial murders can be put to death but for robbery not at all....i can care less about the extent of it


i see you on that robbery thing but what about rape?? l got accused of that @%%! and by ANYMEANS it was not true.. so that being said should i be put to deathif i got guilty?? i mean say someone is tryna get money out of someone who has MILLIONS by accusing them of a ccrime they didnt commit, should they be put todeath if they get gulty???
 
Plato argued that committing an injustice (in this instance, executing a convict) does not make that person more just so there is basically no purpose.
 
Originally Posted by Skip2MyLou23

Plato argued that committing an injustice (in this instance, executing a convict) does not make that person more just so there is basically no purpose.
Is it injustice if the execution of a convict that's been proven guilty by a jury of their peers and indisputable evidence; that is to say,it's not injustice if the execution serves justice. If you'll read a few of Plato's books, you'll find that later in his life he became alittle bit crazy just from age and all the crap he dealt with, so in some cases many people will 100% agree with his earlier theories, and then denounce hiswritings from later in life completely. Just something to consider.
 
Back
Top Bottom