STOP HR3523 AKA CISPA NOW! WORSE THAN SOPA!

4,837
215
Joined
Apr 22, 2010
[h3][/h3]
[h3]Official Summary[/h3]
The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress, which serves Congress. GovTrack did not write and has no control over these summaries.

11/30/2011--Introduced.

Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 - Amends the National Security Act of 1947 to add provisions concerning cyber threat intelligence and information sharing. Defines "cyber threat intelligence" as information in the possession of an element of the intelligence community directly pertaining to a vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity, including information pertaining to the protection of a system or network from: (1) efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network; or (2) theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information. Requires the Director of National Intelligence to: (1) establish procedures to allow intelligence community elements to share cyber threat intelligence with private-sector entities, and (2) encourage the sharing of such intelligence. Requires the procedures established to ensure that such intelligence is only: (1) shared with certified entities or a person with an appropriate security clearance, (2) shared consistent with the need to protect U.S. national security, and (3) used in a manner that protects such intelligence from unauthorized disclosure. Provides for guidelines for the granting of security clearance approvals to certified entities or officers or employees of such entities. Authorizes a cybersecurity provider (a non-governmental entity that provides goods or services intended to be used for cybersecurity purposes), with the express consent of a protected entity (an entity that contracts with a cybersecurity provider) to: (1) use cybersecurity systems to identify and obtain cyber threat information in order to protect the rights and property of the protected entity; and (2) share cyber threat information with any other entity designated by the protected entity, including the federal government. Regulates the use and protection of shared information, including prohibiting the use of such information to gain a competitive advantage and, if shared with the federal government, exempts such information from public disclosure. Prohibits a civil or criminal cause of action against a protected entity, a self-protected entity (an entity that provides goods or services for cybersecurity purposes to itself), or a cybersecurity provider acting in good faith under the above circumstances. Directs the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board to submit annually to Congress a review of the sharing and use of such information by the federal government, as well as recommendations for improvements and modifications to address privacy and civil liberties concerns. Preempts any state statute that restricts or otherwise regulates an activity authorized by the Act.

Again, another broad piece of legislation without specifics.


(2) CYBER THREAT INTELLIGENCE- The term `cyber threat intelligence’ means information in the possession of an element of the intelligence community directly pertaining to a vulnerability of, or threat to, a system or network of a government or private entity, including information pertaining to the protection of a system or network from–

`(A) efforts to degrade, disrupt, or destroy such system or network; or

`(B) theft or misappropriation of private or government information, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3523:


Anyone and everyone is a threat.



Corporations that have lobbied for this Bill:

  • Tech America
  • USTelecom
  • Verizon
  • CTIA – The Wireless Association
  • Sprint Nextel Corporation
  • T-Mobile USA
  • U.S. Cellular
  • Leap Wireless International, Inc./Cricket Communications, Inc.
  • Cellcom
  • Bluegrass Cellular, Inc.
  • Boeing
  • Business Software Alliance
  • Business Roundtable
  • US Chamber of Commerce
  • CSC
  • Edison Electrical Institute
  • Financial Services Roundtable
  • Exelon
  • Comptel
  • Cyber, Space & Intelligence Association
  • EMC Corporation
  • Facebook
  • Independent Telephone & Telecommunications Alliance
  • Information Technology Industry Council
  • Intel
  • Internet Security Alliance
  • Lockheed Martin
  • National Cable & Telecommuications Association
  • National Defense Industrial Association
  • Symantec
  • Oracle
  • AT&T
  • IBM
  • Microsoft
  • Apple
The #!@!+% receiving money from these corporations:
[table][tr][td]Rep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5][/td] [td]$299,000[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7][/td] [td]$235,700[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. James Clyburn [D, SC-6][/td] [td]$225,285[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Anna Eshoo [D, CA-14][/td] [td]$181,809[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. John Boehner [R, OH-8][/td] [td]$181,650[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6][/td] [td]$178,500[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Edward Markey [D, MA-7][/td] [td]$174,065[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Howard McKeon [R, CA-25][/td] [td]$165,000[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30][/td] [td]$155,347[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Rep. James Moran [D, VA-8][/td] [td]$145,800[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td] [/td][/tr][tr][td]Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY][/td] [td]$656,734[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV][/td] [td]$489,345[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY][/td] [td]$469,270[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA][/td] [td]$353,903[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO][/td] [td]$325,800[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH][/td] [td]$310,300[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL][/td] [td]$284,050[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Richard Shelby [R, AL][/td] [td]$275,900[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. John McCain [R, AZ][/td] [td]$259,396[/td] [td]
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA][/td] [td]$258,634[/td][/tr][/table]

Same 'ol, same 'ol warmongering scumbags.
 
Yup, never ending.

Supposedly, Sen. Portman on that list is a favorite VP choice for Romney.
 
indifferent.gif
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)] @ CISPA. The language used in the official summary can be applied to ANYTHING and ANYONE it seems
30t6p3b.gif
. No concrete definition as to who or what qualifies in the realms of these special terms they're throwing around..  8 Months left [/color]
nerd.gif
 
This isnt just a US problem, forces are lined up WORLDWIDE to change and regulate the internet. Googles co-founder has some profound thoughts on this
 
"I've always said; with nations using Gold as money, wars would be very short because if you run out of Gold, you run out of bullets.
Now
paper?� We got lots of paper for you.. infinite wars to enslave us all."

pimp.gif






Waits for the "Well, if you don't like it, don't use the internet" and "If you aren't doing anything illegal, it doesn't affect you.". #+**##$ slaves.
 
Originally Posted by Uter Zorker

This isnt just a US problem, forces are lined up WORLDWIDE to change and regulate the internet. Googles co-founder has some profound thoughts on this


Its never going to stop.
30t6p3b.gif
 
Can't say I'm surprised. 
30t6p3b.gif


We're gonna have another NT blackout because of CISPA?
 
Originally Posted by toine2983

Can't say I'm surprised. 
30t6p3b.gif


We're gonna have another NT blackout because of CISPA?

Hope not. I'll be forced to actually go outside again
30t6p3b.gif
 
Originally Posted by ImStillMike

doubt this will actually go thru
From a political standpoint, this bill already has a lot more support than SOPA did and it's still in it's infant stages.

Something like 106+ representatives cosponsored this bill...

just hope google/wiki/etc blackout again. i really think that's the only reason the last bill got shot down.
 
April 16, 2012
[h2]Stop Cyber Spying Week Launches to Protest CISPA[/h2]
Internet Advocacy Coalition Announces Twitter Campaign to Fight Privacy-Invasive Bill

San Francisco - Civil liberties organizations are launching a week of Internet-wide protests today against the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011 (CISPA), the controversial cybersecurity legislation that would negate existing privacy laws and allow companies to share user data with the government without a court order.

The coalition is urging the public to take part in a Twitter protest directed at their lawmakers. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has created an interactive tool for people to find their representatives and their Twitter handles, and to share how CISPA's privacy invasions would affect their day-to-day lives.

"CISPA would allow ISPs, social networking sites, and anyone else handling Internet communications to monitor users and pass information to the government without any judicial oversight," said EFF Activism Director Rainey Reitman. "The language of this bill is dangerously vague, so that personal online activity – from the mundane to the intimate – could be implicated."

The campaign will use the hashtags #CongressTMI and #CISPA. In addition to the Twitter protest, organizations are planning letters of opposition and publishing articles outlining the civil liberties implications of the bill.

"Some people believe that we have to sacrifice civil liberties in order to shore up cybersecurity, but that's misunderstanding both issues," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee Tien. "Giving companies carte blanche to bypass federal law does not make us safer – it puts us at more risk."

CISPA is sponsored by Representatives Mike Rogers (R-MI) and C.A. “Dutch
 
YES! no more HOODIES. the weather is getting warmer anyway right so i guess we off the HOODIES flow now.
 
Back
Top Bottom