Originally Posted by Joseph Camel Jr
On the other hand though, you know Federer's gonna give it all he has. He's not the most gracious loser, and no doubt he's upset about how he got crushed today.
Actually, I think he was okay today. It was awkward, Rafa almost seemed sorry for Federer and it took the excitement out of the win and Roger looked like aman that had gotten used to losing. Last year, it was far more devastating. He was going for 4 straight GS titles (he had won the 2006 Wimbledon, 2006 USO and2007 Aussie). I believe he was up a set and had a couple break points early in the second set. Plus I think Stefan Edberg handed the championship trophy (orwas that in '06)?
This year, even with the Higueras and a belief he was better, he was probably looking at the other half of the draw thinking, "Nadal has only lostabout 15 games in 4 matches. That averages to about 1.25 games a set.. oh crap."
Bottom line, he is still the 2nd best clay court player in the world (1 semi and 3 finals in 4 years) and it's really just a testament to the greatnessof Rafa on clay. And for the record, Roger learned to play tennis on clay. Even if you watch that Nike commercial about a year ago when Tiger was talking aboutRoger, one of the first clips that showed him as a kid, had him playing on clay.
Looking toward Wimbledon, Roger has to be concerned. If Nadal even got fractionally better on grass, his days of domination may be through. I didn'teven realize it until I saw the replay after the final, but in the first 4 sets last year, Nadal was only broken once.
I honestly think at this point, if Djokovic and Nadal are on opposite sides of the draw, they may play for the final.