I can agree with that, but remember it was Lavar Ball that said if you switched Steph Curry and Lonzo Ball UCLA wouldn't be where they are and GSW would win the NBA Championship.You know the best player rarely wins the championship in college right?
I ain't even saying Lonzo is the best but 14.6, 6, 7.6 on 55%, 41% in college is pretty damn good for a PG.
UCLA was a Top 10 team most of the year. They averaged more points than any other team during the year. They beat Kentucky in Kentucky during the year. They had the better, more rounded team. De'Aaron Fox, broken jumper and all, dropped 39 points on the "Best Player in the World" with all his foot speed. Admit it, if anyone has "Lightweight" thinking here it's you.
I can agree with that, but remember it was Lavar Ball that said if you switched Steph Curry and Lonzo Ball UCLA wouldn't be where they are and GSW would win the NBA Championship.You know the best player rarely wins the championship in college right?
I ain't even saying Lonzo is the best but 14.6, 6, 7.6 on 55%, 41% in college is pretty damn good for a PG.UCLA was a Top 10 team most of the year. They averaged more points than any other team during the year. They beat Kentucky in Kentucky during the year. They had the better, more rounded team. De'Aaron Fox, broken jumper and all, dropped 39 points on the "Best Player in the World" with all his foot speed. Admit it, if anyone has "Lightweight" thinking here it's you.
exactlyI can agree with that, but remember it was Lavar Ball that said if you switched Steph Curry and Lonzo Ball UCLA wouldn't be where they are and GSW would win the NBA Championship.You know the best player rarely wins the championship in college right?
I ain't even saying Lonzo is the best but 14.6, 6, 7.6 on 55%, 41% in college is pretty damn good for a PG.UCLA was a Top 10 team most of the year. They averaged more points than any other team during the year. They beat Kentucky in Kentucky during the year. They had the better, more rounded team. De'Aaron Fox, broken jumper and all, dropped 39 points on the "Best Player in the World" with all his foot speed. Admit it, if anyone has "Lightweight" thinking here it's you.
And that's it. People take his father serious. Or want to use what he says to hold against Lonzo. I rock with Lavar but I don't care what he says as far Lonzo is better than Steph or any of that extreme ****. **** is for entertainment.
Ninja got y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.
Ninja got y'all in in y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.
what i miss in this pass year???Ninja got y'all in in y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.
You don't have to read the buffoonery dude post constantly. A few days ago he seriously tried to argue that Trump was not a racist even though he got sued for housing discrimination twice because he was mentioned in a few rap songs. If rapper name drops you, that means you can be viewed as a racist.
Dudes got tired of his trolling, that has been going on for months and some of the stuff he says about black people is really ridiculous. So their was ether thrown at him, some funny, but some of it crossed the line.
Meth told us all to chill, so now we just don't really respond to Ninja when he tries to bait
what i miss in this pass year???Ninja got y'all in in y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.
You don't have to read the buffoonery dude post constantly. A few days ago he seriously tried to argue that Trump was not a racist even though he got sued for housing discrimination twice because he was mentioned in a few rap songs. If rapper name drops you, that means you can be viewed as a racist.
Dudes got tired of his trolling, that has been going on for months and some of the stuff he says about black people is really ridiculous. So their was ether thrown at him, some funny, but some of it crossed the line.
Meth told us all to chill, so now we just don't really respond to Ninja when he tries to bait
what ninja been up to???
whats with all this trump supporter stuff???
he supports trump???
what i miss in this pass year???You don't have to read the buffoonery dude post constantly. A few days ago he seriously tried to argue that Trump was not a racist even though he got sued for housing discrimination twice because he was mentioned in a few rap songs. If rapper name drops you, that means you can be viewed as a racist.Ninja got y'all in in y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
Dudes got tired of his trolling, that has been going on for months and some of the stuff he says about black people is really ridiculous. So their was ether thrown at him, some funny, but some of it crossed the line.
Meth told us all to chill, so now we just don't really respond to Ninja when he tries to bait
what ninja been up to???
whats with all this trump supporter stuff???
he supports trump???
Your reading comprehension skills suck.
wow
ninja my *****(well not really cause he's not black) hate it had to be him
Ninja got y'all in in y'all so deep in y'all bag that y'all had to freeze him out ? It's only online banter bruvs.Yes I can make the assertion that the center left (I talking about the Hillary Clinton and Obamas of the world, not true centrist the Bill Clintons and Joe Libermans of the world) politicians aren't really neoliberals. You seem to try to make the augment that if you support the private sector handling things that it makes you a neoliberal. Neoliberlaism also means have little to no regulation. The center left wants/cool with well funded public schools, and well regulated charter schools serving an area. The center left is not calling for our education system to be privatized. Right wingers who are true neoliberals want all the things you mentioned plus want to cut funding to public schools and want little to no regulation over Charter Schools, which leads us down the road to privatization.
This why I have an issue with your describing neoliberlism, because it is conflating the center left with the right wing, and it is the right wing economics that has been the real drivers of inequality. Inequality has really picked up over the last 35 years, and that is because our public policy has been right wing or center right on the economics spectrum, not center left. Your labeling ignores important hallmarks of neoliberlism like fiscal austerity and rampant deregulation (in some cases deregulation is a good thing btw, but that is a topic for another day).
And to avoid the talking about you know who, once again It frustrating because you want context to be stripped away for your compassion to work. In the end one person who is committed to systemic changes did an act or charity, acts of person charity he has been doing for a long time, and he didn't present it as a systemic solution. The other person want funding for what was essentially a business venture and he presented it as a solution to a systemic problem. The person you took issue with would generally agree with your calls for jobs programs. He spent much of his presidency asking Congress for funding some.
-Since we have probably strayed off topic you can PM me if you want to continue to continue in the Politics thread. Don't worry, nearly everyone in the thread has decided to freeze out Ninja, so the pointless back and forths are at an all time low.
You don't have to read the buffoonery dude post constantly. A few days ago he seriously tried to argue that Trump was not a racist even though he got sued for housing discrimination twice because he was mentioned in a few rap songs. If rapper name drops you, that means you can be viewed as a racist.
sounds like a mean girls episode.
Dude is like Beetlejuice, say his name enough times and he blows into a thread with his buffoonery.
not defending
Bruv, put down NT and go pick up ABC mouse cause your reading comprehension skills suck. I didn't declare mans as the best player, I'm making the argument that he could be, but we don't know, but your Miss Cleoing self is out here making declarations talmbout "He wont be the best player" as if you can even promise yourself to be able to get up tomorrow and go the day without stubbing your toe.
Lavar comes off as a bit insensitive at times. He literally has no filter whether he's on camera or kicking with he's fam. That's the reason why I rock wtih him tho.
