- Aug 14, 2012
- 23,194
- 28,141
The Invincible Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by 651akathepaul,
- Start date
- Status
- Apr 28, 2009
- 33,347
- 15,147
I cannot believe that we have to watch this guy play QB for the defending champs on opening night.
- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,541
Ravens signed Devin Hester
Sitton is visiting the Bears
Sitton is visiting the Bears
Last edited:
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,255
- 232,467
Man.. So things have calmed down considerably.. NFL falling off
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,255
- 232,467
Vikings going start Shaun hill..
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,635
- 32,343
After their Josh Freeman debacle, I'd sure hope so.
It makes sense though...Bradford probably starts week 2 or 3.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,255
- 232,467
Just looking at the vikes schedule, week 4 or 5 is when I would start him (Giants or Texans)
But then again I assumed pat shurmur had a lot to do with the trade and could help bridge whatever differences/gaps are in whatever he would have previously given him and what the vikes have
But the vikes bye week is early enough (week 6), I could realistically see them waiting til after the bye to start since they would have 10 games remaining
Vs packers in week 2 and then @ panthers week 3 would be the games I would want to avoid.. If I was running things
But then again I assumed pat shurmur had a lot to do with the trade and could help bridge whatever differences/gaps are in whatever he would have previously given him and what the vikes have
But the vikes bye week is early enough (week 6), I could realistically see them waiting til after the bye to start since they would have 10 games remaining
Vs packers in week 2 and then @ panthers week 3 would be the games I would want to avoid.. If I was running things
- Feb 12, 2005
- 60,635
- 32,343
I guess it's mostly dependent on Bradford's familiarity with the offense and similarities to Shurmur's. I don't necessarily think they're looking at the quality of opponent when their defense is still intact. They will keep games close with that unit, regardless.
- Apr 12, 2008
- 15,661
- 4,793
Our best friends in the league.
Love these small gestures they do every now and then.
- Jun 1, 2015
- 16,540
- 4,210
I think you are joking, but I will assume you are serious.
******** = racial slur
49ers ≠
racial slur
I've conceded that if you've read through the conversation. Is the N word ending in A a racial slur or modern slang within the black community? Religion is openly mocked and laughed at in any atheist thread. Should all atheists be banned as a result from speaking derogatorily on religion?
I understand why these rules exist though. I was around during the NikePark days and saw the chaos caused without supervision. I'm just giving you a hard time this morning on the specifics of the rules. If a new member wanted a detailed explanation on what I asked above I'm curious to what the administrations take would be.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 111,959
- 58,778
Our best friends in the league.
dope
silverbackhoney
Banned
- Dec 14, 2014
- 9,160
- 2,675
Our best friends in the league.
dope
I don't get it what's so significant about it
- Jul 30, 2013
- 22,094
- 9,980
Don't get it either.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 111,959
- 58,778
Our best friends in the league.
dope
I don't get it what's so significant about it
Saints tweeting a pic of Brady on his first day of suspension? nah...nothing to see there
- Oct 2, 2012
- 20,110
- 22,021
All I see is a guy that got suspended for a season supporting a guy suspended for a 1/4 of a season...
Birds of a feather
Birds of a feather
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 111,959
- 58,778
of course you do. you're too short sighted to see anything else. hence why you jumped ship to a team that's moving to London in three years
Last edited:
KMante
Staff member
- Aug 2, 2011
- 5,025
- 2,512
They are not allowed; hence, ***** and ****** being censored.
Yes, if they break the rules.
If a member breaks the rules, they are subject to a warning or banishment (from thread and/or site).
Last edited:
- Dec 14, 2004
- 61,462
- 52,846
Giants really not going after Sitton. Can't wait for Reese to be canned once we miss the playoffs because of how much he neglected this ****** line.
- Oct 2, 2012
- 20,110
- 22,021
of course you do. you're too short sighted to see anything else. hence why you jumped ship to a team that's moving to London in three years
Just one year post Thomas's historical collapse into Dilfer 3.0 and Jimmy G & J. Brissett share QB duties to savage a 8-8 season
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 111,959
- 58,778
of course you do. you're too short sighted to see anything else. hence why you jumped ship to a team that's moving to London in three years
Just one year post Thomas's historical collapse into Dilfer 3.0 and Jimmy G & J. Brissett share QB duties to savage a 8-8 season
if i can get 2 or 3 more years out of Brady, i'm good. i'm ready for the dark cloud of mediocrity that's coming in the next few seasons
the AFC East will still be ours doe 
- Dec 27, 2012
- 75,464
- 106,735
The world isn't ready for a Jets-Washington Super Bowl
- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,541
The world has decades to prepare
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,684
- 11,230
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 111,959
- 58,778
you'll have transitioned from watermelon ritas and 4lokos to brandy by then, Nick
- Mar 30, 2007
- 166,255
- 232,467
- Status
