The Invincible Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
and the eagles took 2 WRs in that draft

unfortunately they were Jordan Matthews in the 2nd.. and josh huff in the 3rd

mean.gif
 
 
Last edited:
I also don't think Watkins wants to be in Buffalo so the effort and desire don't seem to fully be there
 
Marshall good for at least 75 yards and a TD against the NE defense :lol

So you'd definitely swap him for Landry, right?

B-Marsh - Patriots, Colts, at Niners

Landry - Niners, at Ravens, at Cardinals

for the whole rest of the year, i dunno.

Tanne is rolling right now. they are in playoff contention. so looking at three games, Landry might be the guy. Jets QB situation is up in the air. they could switch back to Petty or who knows.
 
 
and the eagles took 2 WRs in that draft

unfortunately they were Jordan Matthews in the 2nd.. and josh huff in the 3rd


mean.gif
 
My condolences
sick.gif
it is what it is.. which is funny.. the simple points I was trying to get across during the draft, which I don't think @CP1708  ever got during our argument (and still doesn't based on what he said yesterday)

the number of picks you have or how you use them doesn't guarantee you will come away with a better football team.. and you can get talent from anywhere

right now wentz is throwing to: 1st AND 2nd round WRs from 2015, a 2nd round WR from 2014 and a 2nd round TE from 2013 (all taken in the first 50 picks of their drafts).. then there was the 3rd round WR from 2014, that got cut

the browns have had multiple 1st rounders in 3 out of the last 5 drafts
 
Last edited:
Rich CiminiVerified account
‏@RichCimini
Belichick gave unsolicited s/o to #Jets LB Josh Martin for special-teams prowess. Don't think JM has come up in a single Bowles presser.

Patriots offseason free agent target
 
Last edited:
matthews would be a #3 on the steelers..

I think he'd be a very good #2 on most teams around the league.
 
Yes, cuz I said just having picks is all that matters.

Not coaching them up, using their skill sets to maximize their usefulness in your offense/defense, etc is needed.

Just possesing picks, that's all that matters. I said that. :rolleyes
 
Yes, cuz I said just having picks is all that matters.

Not coaching them up, using their skill sets to maximize their usefulness in your offense/defense, etc is needed.

Just possesing picks, that's all that matters. I said that.
eyes.gif
where in the above do I say "this is what CP said".. I've quoted numerous times your position.. and I've responded to specific things that I didn't specifically ALWAYS agree with.. because as I said then, I didn't disagree with points you made.. just that there was a hard rule to any of it

however, you did continually reference the picks we were given up, so I referenced that point several teams (since we had 10 picks in that draft.. and we have 8 picks going in to this draft)

above, I reiterated the point I made.. which again, is pretty simple.. but you were never actually reading what I was saying
 
Last edited:
K, great.

Is there a point you stop bringing up those ******* picks with my name? Or do you need to keep reiterating your reiterations of retelling me your reiterations?

Asking for a friend.
 
K, great.

Is there a point you stop bringing up those ******* picks with my name? Or do you need to keep reiterating your reiterations of retelling me your reiterations?

Asking for a friend.
you're the expert buddy..

I never presumed to judge somebody because I didn't know shhh.. which was how this all started..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom