- Sep 18, 2003
- 61,869
- 134,120
Peak artest could average 16/10/6/1.7/1 in the NBA finals?So peak Dray can be the 2nd option on a 61 win team?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peak artest could average 16/10/6/1.7/1 in the NBA finals?So peak Dray can be the 2nd option on a 61 win team?
Draymond the best defender of the last 10 years and the lead distributor of one of the best offenses we’ve ever seen
Folks get real weird when it comes to him.
Peak artest could average 16/10/6/1.7/1 in the NBA finals?
And I’ll take that as a no for RonI take that as a no.
AD is obviously a better all around player, which wasn’t even what was being discussed.B Sox you clamored for your Celtics to trade for Dray or AD?
Of course Draymond is better.I remember dudes was saying Dray is better than Pacers Ron Artest. That let me know a lot.
Draymond the best defender of the last 10 years and the lead distributor of one of the best offenses we’ve ever seen
Folks get real weird when it comes to him.
What does AD have to do with how good Draymond is? I thought we were comparing him to Artest?
Think he prioritized being present for his family, but he's been more visible this year. He's got his ESPN gig, podcast with JJ Redick on Mondays and co-hosts another NBA podcast.I'm convinced there is a conspiracy against Tim Legler, every time I hear him speak I learn about a new facet of the game I never knew. He's the best in the business. Full stop. I don't know how he's not more visible doing commentary on prime time games and within Sportscenter, maybe because he doesn't partake in hyperbole?
AD is obviously a better all around player, which wasn’t even what was being discussed.
You really just be talking sometimes
Those guys are specialty roles that will always be needed.The discussion was about modern players being more skilled.
I personally just don’t think that players from 1980 - the present day are that much far apart than each other in terms of skills.
If some want to argue the 50s, 60s, and early 70s, go ahead.
But again, the current NBA has guys like Pat Beverly, Boban, Andre Drummond, etc.
The skills are on par IMO. Now the pace and style of play can be different, but the skills of dudes from the 80s, 90s, and 2000s and currently are close to equal than people like to admit
I mentioned a guy like Tayshaun Prince
He was the second best player on a 73 win team. The roles he plays are just as if not more valuable than a second scoring option, not that they didnt need both (no shot at Klay)So peak Dray can be the 2nd option on a 61 win team?
Please break down how Dray is a better defender than AD
Those guys are specialty roles that will always be needed.
I don't know why y'all keep pushing this.
AD is way better rim protector than Dray. He covers way more ground and he can defend the perimeter.
He was the second best player on a 73 win team. The roles he plays are just as if not more valuable than a second scoring option, not that they didnt need both (no shot at Klay)
The discussion was about modern players being more skilled.
I personally just don’t think that players from 1980 - the present day are that much far apart than each other in terms of skills.
If some want to argue the 50s, 60s, and early 70s, go ahead.
But again, the current NBA has guys like Pat Beverly, Boban, Andre Drummond, etc.
The skills are on par IMO. Now the pace and style of play can be different, but the skills of dudes from the 80s, 90s, and 2000s and currently are close to equal than people like to admit
I mentioned a guy like Tayshaun Prince