- 73,362
- 99,973
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
kind of
Really don't see that happening in this league. At least with the upper echelon players.
That's fair, but I don't see a front office telling the coach to not play a top 15-20 player because of the bonuses.I seen something about Doc giving Nate Robinson DNPs (even though Nate was a role player) and it cost him 1.5 million in bonuses
Front offices and owners are definitely aware of incentives and bonuses. It’s really a slippery slope and I personally wouldn’t want an incentivized contract. To much of a gray area at times
that will be an awesome seriesThe clippers and the mavericks are destined to play each other in the 1st round forever
This would squeeze all but the top 15-20 players in the league. The PA would never do this.I think incentived contracts are a joke. The NBa should simplify. Have 2 year contracts. Set a max and a min. And a hard cap you can’t spend over. No such thing as luxury tax etc. This allows teams to not get mired into bad contracts for long term and for players to earn what they are actually worth. If you’re taking a risk 2 years is fair to both a player and a team considering the life changing sort of dollars that these players earn. The only players this arguably hurts is those superstar level talents that are constantly hurt or constantly sitting for some reason. Everyone else benefits.
They could fall to 3 or 4 with a loss.Surprised Milwaukee isn’t throwing this game but wouldn’t doubt it if they plan to at some point
I’d rather play Cleveland, Orlando or even Indiana than Philly/miami. Especially with Gianni’s’ injuryThey could fall to 3 or 4 with a loss.