UNCC Shooting - multiple fatalities

I don't get it. Most of these mass shootings on this level are done by white people

hence the OG question of whether it was a white shooter or not.

That's a perfectly logical question and assumption.
 
I'm not, I'm genuinely curious what double standards you see. I think you misunderstand the reason that question is asked in situations like this. It's not even about bashing "white people" it's about preparing yourself mentally to see the President of the United States of America and his crew go on a rampage against a black or brown shooter and make sure we know how every other black or brown person is just as capable of such violence and that "we" need to protect America from the black and brown menace, but if the shooter is white we MIGHT get a tweet addressing it but whomever does speak about the event will make sure to let us know that this young white angel was a victim of bullying and of mental health issues that although he is heavily affiliated with white supremacy and follows Trump and the alt right he is a lone wolf who acted out all by himself with no prior indication that he would be violent.

So let's get past your desire for things to be fair and even in whatever world you reside, in the real world the double standard that should truly upset you is that what I just typed has happened time and time again. They will find a way to make this young white man to look like he just made a bad decision due to pressure and abuse from the other people in his school. What are you preaching in here? Are you preaching that there are obvious racial disparities in the treatment of shooters? Or are you preaching that you just don't wanna hear it?
So the whole jist of your comment is that a person can't be disgusted at more than one thing at once?
 
So the whole jist of your comment is that a person can't be disgusted at more than one thing at once?

Not even close.....
You're either playing obtuse or you have a specific retort that you want to lead me to
 
I don't get it. Most of these mass shootings on this level are done by white people

hence the OG question of whether it was a white shooter or not.

That's a perfectly logical question and assumption.
White radical Christians is a huge problem that’s trying to be shoved under the rug to protect the white stereotype ....... “but why are you asking?????????”. Like the point is ironically being proven
 
I’m not your daddy. I’m not going to explain something from square one. Just move on. You simply have no idea what you’re talking about
So you can't justify your double standard?

Not even close.....
You're either playing obtuse or you have a specific retort that you want to lead me to
It's literally in the first sentence of your second paragraph:

"So let's get past your desire for things to be fair and even in whatever world you reside, in the real world the double standard that should truly upset you is that what I just typed has happened time and time again."
 
There's a whole paragraph describing why people ask the question that you have an issue with and you take hold on the sentence after it all.....so it is playing obtuse
 
So you can't justify your double standard?


It's literally in the first sentence of your second paragraph:

"So let's get past your desire for things to be fair and even in whatever world you reside, in the real world the double standard that should truly upset you is that what I just typed has happened time and time again."
Wheres the double standard you claim?? What do you want to be allowed to say here buddy?
 
If anything that first sentence in that second paragraph is acknowledging you calling "hypocrisy" is funny because of how unfair the media and the gov't portray violent offenders based on their race
 
Wheres the double standard you claim?? What do you want to be allowed to say here buddy?
If you had paid attention the double standard was literally called out in my second comment in this thread. Please show me where I said I'd like to be able to say something that I currently am not already able to say? The implication that you're trying to make here is awfully weak, and really only supports the idea that you can't defend the double standard allowed here.
 
If you had paid attention the double standard was literally called out in my second comment in this thread. Please show me where I said I'd like to be able to say something that I currently am not already able to say? The implication that you're trying to make here is awfully weak, and really only supports the idea that you can't defend the double standard allowed here.
Nothing said here is racist champ. That’s what you’re not getting. Your feelings being hurt doesn’t make it racist
 
There's a whole paragraph describing why people ask the question that you have an issue with and you take hold on the sentence after it all.....so it is playing obtuse
I literally told you in a previous comment that I'm well aware of multiple double standards in our society. My issue is with the double standard that's allowed which I've also already pointed out. I know you that it's more than "taking a jab" but that's literally all it comes across as. It doesn't further discourse on the issue nor does it expose something that isn't already obvious. It just comes across as "lol we can give out racist jabs too" which I mean, is fine, it's the internet there are no universal rules as to what does or doesn't fly. But don't try and make it out as some profound thing when all it really is, is just racism.
 
I literally told you in a previous comment that I'm well aware of multiple double standards in our society. My issue is with the double standard that's allowed which I've also already pointed out. I know you that it's more than "taking a jab" but that's literally all it comes across as. It doesn't further discourse on the issue nor does it expose something that isn't already obvious. It just comes across as "lol we can give out racist jabs too" which I mean, is fine, it's the internet there are no universal rules as to what does or doesn't fly. But don't try and make it out as some profound thing when all it really is, is just racism.

But here's the thing, you keep calling it "racism" without explaining how it's racism. Nobody here seems to see it as racism, I certainly don't. That's why I asked for clarification in my "Do tell" response.

Or as you said previously "Use more words"
 
I literally told you in a previous comment that I'm well aware of multiple double standards in our society. My issue is with the double standard that's allowed which I've also already pointed out. I know you that it's more than "taking a jab" but that's literally all it comes across as. It doesn't further discourse on the issue nor does it expose something that isn't already obvious. It just comes across as "lol we can give out racist jabs too" which I mean, is fine, it's the internet there are no universal rules as to what does or doesn't fly. But don't try and make it out as some profound thing when all it really is, is just racism.
Are you white?
 
Of course you are. The issue is it seems is that you haven't figured out how to use it yet. So instead, you are attempting to be the victim.

Are you white?
Ah there it is, everybody who thinks different to you must be some sort of enemy.
 
Ah there it is, everybody who thinks different to you must be some sort of enemy.
Nope. I admire John Brown, a white dude. He thought different from me, as he was christian.
Are you white?
 
Back
Top Bottom