Under Armour?


What the Bays on sale for $112 with champs 'GET20' sale
sizes 10 through 13 available at the moment
 
Kelsey Plum

1747446458629.png
 
Shouldn’t we be glad it’s available on sale?

Just shaking my head and nobody buying these. Nobody hooping in them. Nobody caring about them in the slightest. I bet DF loves whatever money he got, but he absolutely can't be happy at how poorly this shoe has done. Nobody talks about it. Nobody posts about it. Other athletes don't wear it (that I've seen, and I watch a lot and look at a lot of images).

Just sucks. When Steph retires next year, it might be a wrap.

Also, posted that 4 hours ago and just checked the link and they still have all 'average' mens sizes. From 9 to 13. That just tells you how incredibly bad these are. People won't even pay $44 for em, but people spent almost literally five times that amount to buy a retro of a shoe that came out 1990.

This morning.
 
Just shaking my head and nobody buying these. Nobody hooping in them. Nobody caring about them in the slightest. I bet DF loves whatever money he got, but he absolutely can't be happy at how poorly this shoe has done. Nobody talks about it. Nobody posts about it. Other athletes don't wear it (that I've seen, and I watch a lot and look at a lot of images).

Just sucks. When Steph retires next year, it might be a wrap.

Also, posted that 4 hours ago and just checked the link and they still have all 'average' mens sizes. From 9 to 13. That just tells you how incredibly bad these are. People won't even pay $44 for em, but people spent almost literally five times that amount to buy a retro of a shoe that came out 1990.

This morning.

Nobody buying these.. in the US. How its doing elsewhere no idea. Also I would not compare how a jordan retro is doing to current sig because 99% sure that retro won’t be used for balling, but more for casual wear. Compare it to the zion, luka, and tatum sigs that nobody pays attention to.

To add, not sure if the nba has similar rule to the w, where those that don’t have shoe contracts are forced to wear swoosh. Might contribute to not seeing a lot wearing ua.

I’ve already seen multiple colorways of the zion 4 on sale and that that just released.
 
Nobody buying these.. in the US. How its doing elsewhere no idea. Also I would not compare how a jordan retro is doing to current sig because 99% sure that retro won’t be used for balling, but more for casual wear. Compare it to the zion, luka, and tatum sigs that nobody pays attention to.

To add, not sure if the nba has similar rule to the w, where those that don’t have shoe contracts are forced to wear swoosh. Might contribute to not seeing a lot wearing ua.

I’ve already seen multiple colorways of the zion 4 on sale and that that just released.
That WNBA rule is not the case in the NB, but thanks I never knew that!
 
This has to be the closest they've come to being out of business when it comes to the NBA.

Nobody's checkin for the Series 7. I don't think guys would play in the Fox line if you gave them away for free. The Curry takedown stuff, which peaked at the 3 Zero III, is pitiful.

While at the same time, people are buying Way of Wades, Antas, EQLZ, and you have your big players all in the market - Nike, Adidas, Puma, but also now Converse and Reebok. On top of them, you've got new players in the performance basketball shoe space like Skechers and New Balance. And just for fun, the 361s, Li-Nings, SPO, Rigorer, a few of which have at least one signature shoe athlete in the NBA. UA had a hell of a head start and only has Fox and Curry in the NBA, and Plum in the WNBA. That's a massive failure for a US-based Brand headquartered in a major city with a basketball history.

The "Flow" technology is still there, and if they could just figure out how to use it or make it better with some better designs, they could perhaps capture some attention.
 
Back
Top Bottom