- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,697
- 106,365
I knew I mixed them joints up, but **** i rolled with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
its more the typical storyline of semi interesting origin, oh no we need a final battle, dont owrry lets throw in a bigger uglier version of our hero and call it a day
We're talking about the 2nd Hulk movie b. That was not a sequel of the first Hulk movie. They completely revamped and re-did the origin on the run. Not to mention the first Hulk movie was different enough for them to go back to a "typical" Hulk story.
TIH was great.
Yall dudes buggin. At least I can see more complaints even though they sound way off like they talking about a different movie. Before dudes would say they didn't like it but not say why.
Also @ it was a typical Hulk story as if there had been several Hulk movies before that were all so similar. I mean the first Hulk movie with Bana was something I can see being called boring. It had Thomas Jane Punisher tone and pacing. TIH was action packed.
Hulk being hunted by Ross and the government. Typical.
That's like saying Captain America fighting Nazis? Typical
Thor fighting Loki? Typical
Are you guys like not aware of Hulk comics or something? Hell watch a few eps of the Hulk cartoon and get a clue.
word to the first iron man movie
Marvel is reportedly seeking Kurt Russell to play Star-Lord's father in James Gunn's Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2. It looks as if discussions are still very early as The Wrap reports that Kurt has yet to read the script and Marvel has yet to make a formal offer but meetings are expected to occur very soon.
i'm just bored of the hero vs bigger uglier version of hero storyline. the best stories are usually about contrast rather than mirrored powerI mean they did cast Tim Roth as Emil Blonksy, the man who becomes the Abomination. I would expect him to be the Abomination some time in that movie.its more the typical storyline of semi interesting origin, oh no we need a final battle, dont owrry lets throw in a bigger uglier version of our hero and call it a dayWe're talking about the 2nd Hulk movie b. That was not a sequel of the first Hulk movie. They completely revamped and re-did the origin on the run. Not to mention the first Hulk movie was different enough for them to go back to a "typical" Hulk story.TIH was great.
Yall dudes buggin. At least I can see more complaints even though they sound way off like they talking about a different movie. Before dudes would say they didn't like it but not say why.
Also@ it was a typical Hulk story as if there had been several Hulk movies before that were all so similar. I mean the first Hulk movie with Bana was something I can see being called boring. It had Thomas Jane Punisher tone and pacing. TIH was action packed.
Hulk being hunted by Ross and the government. Typical.
That's like saying Captain America fighting Nazis? Typical
Thor fighting Loki? Typical
Are you guys like not aware of Hulk comics or something?Hell watch a few eps of the Hulk cartoon and get a clue.
word to the first iron man movie
cap's idea of freedom vs hydra
Mindless beast vs. Power hungry military dude isnt constrasting?i'm just bored of the hero vs bigger uglier version of hero storyline. the best stories are usually about contrast rather than mirrored power
batman vs joker
cap's idea of freedom vs hydra
superman vs lex
jessica jones vs killjoy
rorschach vs ozymandias
a **** measuring contest between hero and villain is easy and boring, it requires a lot of creativity to take two characters that each bring something completely different to the table and work out how the different powers would match up.
Aside from picking a side, VanCamp teased a budding romance with Steve Rogers (Chris Evans), which is something that their comic book counterparts have been involved in. "We get to explore... I can't say we are going to that extent of it, but they are certainly getting to know each other," she explained. "And they know who each other are." Will fans be happy with a Steve-Sharon romance? "That’s where it all gets really tricky,” the 29-year-old actress admitted, “because there are die-hard fans that want to see him with different people. There’s all the different camps, so hopefully people are happy with it."
But it won't be all romance for Sharon as VanCamp teased a fight scene. "I got to do a small fight sequence with Scarlett [Johansson] which was fun," she said. "We’re all just kind of kicking *** in those movies." By the way, the ET video (below) has her battling Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen), but the ET article mentions Scarlett Johansson. That's because VanCamp only says the fight is with "Scarlett/Scarlet." However, since we know Scarlet Witch is on Team Cap we can safely assume she meant Black Widow, who is playing both sides during the conflict.
im the biggest cap fan in here thoYou dudes always low key taking shots at my herocap's idea of freedom vs hydra
mindless beast vs bigger uglier mindless beast in a fight that comes down to who is the more beastly mindless beastMindless beast vs. Power hungry military dude isnt constrasting?i'm just bored of the hero vs bigger uglier version of hero storyline. the best stories are usually about contrast rather than mirrored power
batman vs joker
cap's idea of freedom vs hydra
superman vs lex
jessica jones vs killjoy
rorschach vs ozymandias
a **** measuring contest between hero and villain is easy and boring, it requires a lot of creativity to take two characters that each bring something completely different to the table and work out how the different powers would match up.
U act like it was hulk vs bizarro
Cap is the biggest Cap fan here.
what?!?!?!mindless beast vs bigger uglier mindless beast in a fight that comes down to who is the more beastly mindless beast
its all about execution and creating an interesting story.what?!?!?!mindless beast vs bigger uglier mindless beast in a fight that comes down to who is the more beastly mindless beast
I guess you hate Wolverine vs. Sabertooth
Batman vs. Deathstroke
Superman vs. Zod
like what did you want from that movie... what story do you suggest they do (and don't say planet hulk considering the comic series didn't even start til 2006, which is when this movie probably started filming)
as MasterZik said your disapproval must really be coming from a place of someone who has never read a Hulk comic
the Hulk fight was about a man who sees his power as a curse vs a man who sees the power as a blessing.
Bruce never wanted that power but Blonsky wanted it after seeing and would do anything to get it.
Umm half of these count.i'm just bored of the hero vs bigger uglier version of hero storyline. the best stories are usually about contrast rather than mirrored power
its more the typical storyline of semi interesting origin, oh no we need a final battle, dont owrry lets throw in a bigger uglier version of our hero and call it a day
We're talking about the 2nd Hulk movie b. That was not a sequel of the first Hulk movie. They completely revamped and re-did the origin on the run. Not to mention the first Hulk movie was different enough for them to go back to a "typical" Hulk story.
TIH was great.
Yall dudes buggin. At least I can see more complaints even though they sound way off like they talking about a different movie. Before dudes would say they didn't like it but not say why.
Also @ it was a typical Hulk story as if there had been several Hulk movies before that were all so similar. I mean the first Hulk movie with Bana was something I can see being called boring. It had Thomas Jane Punisher tone and pacing. TIH was action packed.
Hulk being hunted by Ross and the government. Typical.
That's like saying Captain America fighting Nazis? Typical
Thor fighting Loki? Typical
Are you guys like not aware of Hulk comics or something? Hell watch a few eps of the Hulk cartoon and get a clue.
word to the first iron man movie
I mean they did cast Tim Roth as Emil Blonksy, the man who becomes the Abomination. I would expect him to be the Abomination some time in that movie.
batman vs joker
cap's idea of freedom vs hydra
superman vs lex
jessica jones vs killjoy
rorschach vs ozymandias
a **** measuring contest between hero and villain is easy and boring, it requires a lot of creativity to take two characters that each bring something completely different to the table and work out how the different powers would match up.
That's cuz the scripts for the X-Men movies were terrible and they cast the wrong guy for Sabertooth. They got the casting right in Origins but managed to churn out an even worse script.its all about execution and creating an interesting story.
what?!?!?!mindless beast vs bigger uglier mindless beast in a fight that comes down to who is the more beastly mindless beast
I guess you hate Wolverine vs. Sabertooth
Batman vs. Deathstroke
Superman vs. Zod
like what did you want from that movie... what story do you suggest they do (and don't say planet hulk considering the comic series didn't even start til 2006, which is when this movie probably started filming)
as MasterZik said your disapproval must really be coming from a place of someone who has never read a Hulk comic
in the first few xmen movies wolverine vs sabertooth was pretty boring
It was still trash. It did not become more interesting especially then. If anything it kind of made less sense for his betrayal. In that montage and intro to the movie they were shown to be like brothers who had their mutant powers in common. Logan was the guy keeping Creed from going too far. Creed didn't even want to work for the man but Logan convinced him and they went along. Then from there it's complete ******* with Striker and the other Weapon X guys getting hunted down or involved.in the awful trash heap that was xmen origins, wolverine it was more interesting because we got the history of them being brothers and fighting alongside eachother. there is now emotional weight to a fight between these two people.
I aint gonna comment on a movie that aint out yet.batman vs deathstroke is all about the story, if deathstroke shows up for no reason trying to kill batman then yeah it can be a cool fight but it doesnt really mean much in the big picture. pretty much like the end of phantom menace, cool action but we dont care about the characters or why they are fighting.
I'm sorry I found nothing interesting about this if you're talking MOS.superman vs zod is interesting because you have two conflicting ideologies and two character backstories/motivations that you can relate to or at least understand. superman is an earth boy and will do whatever it takes to protect his planet. zod needs to use earth as a way to save his race and rebuild krypton.
the end of the incredible hulk is just a two hulks in a meaningless fight in a city. what happens if abomination wins? no idea, his character traits are nothing more than generic bad guy out to kill the hero.
Well now your opinion on this obvious You don't like the Hulk.I have never read a hulk comic and I dont find the character to be interesting, I would much rather watch a character piece on bruce banner than a movie that focuses on the big green guy. all the other avengers have their own story and motivations.
That's irrelevant to the topic. There not being another Hulk solo movie has nothing to do with source materialI dont think there will be or should be another solo hulk movie.
the woverine sabertooth storyline was the only positive of origins and even then its 4.5/8 at best in terms of being positive because of the terrible writing. but still, there is a backstory which gives the fights/rivalry meaning and weight.That's cuz the scripts for the X-Men movies were terrible and they cast the wrong guy for Sabertooth. They got the casting right in Origins but managed to churn out an even worse script.its all about execution and creating an interesting story.
in the first few xmen movies wolverine vs sabertooth was pretty boring
I'm not the biggest fan of Sabertooth or his rivalry with Wolverine but I understand what's so great about it when you dig in to it and they go at it. One embraces his feral side and being a bad guy while the other fights his base instincts striving to be a honorable man. Then Sabertooth does a bunch of vile stuff to drag Wolverine down to his level while Wolverine stops him and overcomes it.
It was still trash. It did not become more interesting especially then. If anything it kind of made less sense for his betrayal. In that montage and intro to the movie they were shown to be like brothers who had their mutant powers in common. Logan was the guy keeping Creed from going too far. Creed didn't even want to work for the man but Logan convinced him and they went along. Then from there it's complete ******* with Striker and the other Weapon X guys getting hunted down or involved.in the awful trash heap that was xmen origins, wolverine it was more interesting because we got the history of them being brothers and fighting alongside eachother. there is now emotional weight to a fight between these two people.I aint gonna comment on a movie that aint out yet.batman vs deathstroke is all about the story, if deathstroke shows up for no reason trying to kill batman then yeah it can be a cool fight but it doesnt really mean much in the big picture. pretty much like the end of phantom menace, cool action but we dont care about the characters or why they are fighting.
But Deathstroke is not a contrast to Batman. He's not bigger or uglier but comics wise he's just assassin Batman. Depends on SS how they'll change that to make him going up against Batman seem interesting.I'm sorry I found nothing interesting about this if you're talking MOS.superman vs zod is interesting because you have two conflicting ideologies and two character backstories/motivations that you can relate to or at least understand. superman is an earth boy and will do whatever it takes to protect his planet. zod needs to use earth as a way to save his race and rebuild krypton.
It was just a rehash of the OG movie.
Plus again Zod is just evil Superman. Same powers and weaknesses just more ruthless.Seems to me you're completely ignoring Emil's motives and aspirations in TIH. They were clearly portrayed. From when he joined, to when he got crippled and was offered the experimental gamma drug, to when he went to Sterns and forced him to up things so he could be better than the Hulk. There was depth and contrast there based off of how he felt about Banner and what he thought of the Hulk.the end of the incredible hulk is just a two hulks in a meaningless fight in a city. what happens if abomination wins? no idea, his character traits are nothing more than generic bad guy out to kill the hero.Well now your opinion on this obviousI have never read a hulk comic and I dont find the character to be interesting, I would much rather watch a character piece on bruce banner than a movie that focuses on the big green guy. all the other avengers have their own story and motivations.You don't like the Hulk.
I mean okay that's fine but I can't take your views on the movie the same way I'd take someone who comes in to this with no bias or someone who likes the Hulk and is just judging the movie on what makes a good superhero movie. You right though, it does have to do with execution and making and interesting story.That's irrelevant to the topic. There not being another Hulk solo movie has nothing to do with source materialI dont think there will be or should be another solo hulk movie.