- 520
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
I was wondering what part of the foot is it needed at the most? Or does it depend on the person's style of play,frame,or foot arch. Does it really matter?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
of course full-length is the best lol.Originally Posted by dimsum1
I agree that Zoom Air is more beneficial in the forefoot. However, shoes with full length zoom hair have been known to be pretty good from a performance perspective, also.
Originally Posted by Dark Chocolate
It's not needed at all as it has never scientifically been proven to do anything, not even protecting the foot.
Let's see it. I would like more information on this, and the scientists that conducted the study. I would like to know the results of thisstudy, even after Nike was forced to change the composition of Air based shoes as well.Originally Posted by CWK
Dark Chocolate,
The structural and cushioning benefits of Zoom Air have been scientifically proven thousands of times, starting way back with the Vis Zoom Uptempo.
Many so called educated people believe a whole lot of *things* that are not true. Prove that tenth grade physics can be applied in regard to zoomair and its effectiveness.Originally Posted by Catch22
Originally Posted by Dark Chocolate
It's not needed at all as it has never scientifically been proven to do anything, not even protecting the foot.
????? Published in JAMA? No. But proven, presented, and accepted by many educated people.
Besides, basic 10th grade physics proves that it works. Why the hate?
Originally Posted by Dark Chocolate
Let's see it. I would like more information on this, and the scientists that conducted the study. I would like to know the results of this study, even after Nike was forced to change the composition of Air based shoes as well.