xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
What was the point of you making this thread? Did you really not expect a bunch of replies trying to make it look how the two situations couldn't possibly be any more different from each other?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by truthteller
Bron decided the cavs weren't worth going back to, and the colts decided manning wasn't worth bringing back...bottom line.
The reasons were very different, but bottom line was similar IMO. Both parties said " ehh I'm moving on ".
Originally Posted by truthteller
Durden, I understand its a business but where was all this business talk last year.
Bron was called ungreatful, disloyal and many other names when he thought with his brain and not his heart and took what he felt was his best shot to get chips.
This makes him look smart IMO, why should players show any loyalty when its rarely returned. Should be a wake-up call for any player thinking his team cares about them at all. If a top qb in history gets kicked to the curb for an unproven rookie nobody is safe.
couldnt you say.. lebron " i think its time to move in a different direction" and colts saying "we cant win the peyton anymore?"...Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by truthteller
Bron decided the cavs weren't worth going back to, and the colts decided manning wasn't worth bringing back...bottom line.
The reasons were very different, but bottom line was similar IMO. Both parties said " ehh I'm moving on ".
Thats the basics of sports as a business though, how the parties handle "moving on" is where the massive difference is though.
LeBron made a "I dont think I can win here" move, and the Colts made a "It's time to move on in a difference direction" move. Two very different principles.
No, not at all. Thats not how things played out.Originally Posted by YoungTriz
couldnt you say.. lebron " i think its time to move in a different direction" and colts saying "we cant win the peyton anymore?"...Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by truthteller
Bron decided the cavs weren't worth going back to, and the colts decided manning wasn't worth bringing back...bottom line.
The reasons were very different, but bottom line was similar IMO. Both parties said " ehh I'm moving on ".
Thats the basics of sports as a business though, how the parties handle "moving on" is where the massive difference is though.
LeBron made a "I dont think I can win here" move, and the Colts made a "It's time to move on in a difference direction" move. Two very different principles.
I think you are confusing vilification of HOW he left with vilification simply BECAUSE he left.Originally Posted by truthteller
^^
Same could be said about the cavs right?
Mo Williams and Antwon Jamison, shouldn't be reason enough for him to go back to Cleveland. Bron made a business decision too, except he was vilified for it.
Originally Posted by JD214
Originally Posted by Durden7
This thread makes no sense.
There is NO comparison.