Why doesnt Niketalk add...

Instead of rep we should use a system to gauge the quality of a post, in our own slang.

It will be "crack" or "wack".
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

a rep system like BB.com?

it would help show whos a good poster and contributes to the forum with quality posts and who doesnt.

this is a serious suggestion, some might like it and others wont but this would help show whos a good poster and whos not.
I second this.
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

a rep system like BB.com?

it would help show whos a good poster and contributes to the forum with quality posts and who doesnt.

this is a serious suggestion, some might like it and others wont but this would help show whos a good poster and whos not.
I second this.
 
I remember Meth discussed a system of this ilk last year. I'll try to find the post.
 
I remember Meth discussed a system of this ilk last year. I'll try to find the post.
 
Originally Posted by Frank Mucus

negged brah

laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

a rep system like BB.com?

it would help show whos a good poster and contributes to the forum with quality posts and who doesnt.

this is a serious suggestion, some might like it and others wont but this would help show whos a good poster and whos not.

A rep system is not necessary. NTers that make quality posts don't need stats to show if they're a good poster or not.
Sigs reading I need to rep this nter and so on...lame.
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

a rep system like BB.com?

it would help show whos a good poster and contributes to the forum with quality posts and who doesnt.

this is a serious suggestion, some might like it and others wont but this would help show whos a good poster and whos not.

A rep system is not necessary. NTers that make quality posts don't need stats to show if they're a good poster or not.
Sigs reading I need to rep this nter and so on...lame.
 
Back
Top Bottom