- 87,400
- 115,544
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ya, I tend to think it's one or the other. And "depth" might team with "frontcourt size" for that matter.Need both, but that ain’t happening.
Pacers ain't it.Pacers
Mavs
Wolves
I swear to God......
I just want to know who are these random hypothetical valuable players (that a ton of teams need btw) that are just growing on trees apparently?
Yeah big dog, it’s just you.Minnesota beat the champs with their head coach sitting in the second row, not coaching.
I find that interesting. Prolly just me tho.
I find this equally interesting.
Yeesh. Look how many didn't even make it past rd 1.
Minnesota beat the champs with their head coach sitting in the second row, not coaching.
I find that interesting. Prolly just me tho.
To preach the narrative 'Long money = short playoff run', I need 2 things:
1. A sample size bigger than 1 season.
2. To abandon my position as a fan and move into a controlling position for the team.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Trust, it's not a forever thing or every year.
Stars get paid. Zero argument.
It's the stars that get paid for future performance vs past performance. The level they can impact the game on both sides, not just one side.
Prime Bron worth every penny, impact on both sides of ball.
Today Bron can't impact both sides full time. That's the imbalance.