You are being lied to about Somali Pirates.

2,506
109
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
I really suggest you read this NT but I'll add Cliffnotes at the bottom anyway.

[h2]Somalia: You Are Being Lied to About Pirates[/h2]Jump to Comments
[table][tr][td]
by Johann Hari
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]
13193.jpg
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]
Global Research,
[/td] [/tr][/table]
Who imagined that in 2009, the world's governments would be declaring a new War on Pirates? As you read this, the British Royal Navy - backed by the ships of more than two dozen nations, from the US to China - is sailing into Somalian waters to take on men we still picture as parrot-on-the-shoulder pantomime villains. They will soon be fighting Somalian ships and even chasing the pirates onto land, into one of the most broken countries on earth. But behind the arrr-me-hearties oddness of this tale, there is an untold scandal. The people our governments are labeling as "one of the great menace of our times" have an extraordinary story to tell - and some justice on their side.

Pirates have never been quite who we think they are. In the "golden age of piracy" - from 1650 to 1730 - the idea of the pirate as the senseless, savage thief that lingers today was created by the British government in a great propaganda-heave. Many ordinary people believed it was false: pirates were often rescued from the gallows by supportive crowds. Why? What did they see that we can't? In his book Villains of All nations, the historian Marcus Rediker pores through the evidence to find out. If you became a merchant or navy sailor then - plucked from the docks of London's East End, young and hungry - you ended up in a floating wooden Hell. You worked all hours on a cramped, half-starved ship, and if you slacked off for a second, the all-powerful captain would whip you with the Cat O' Nine Tails. If you slacked consistently, you could be thrown overboard. And at the end of months or years of this, you were often cheated of your wages.

Pirates were the first people to rebel against this world. They mutinied against their tyrannical captains - and created a different way of working on the seas. Once they had a ship, the pirates elected their captains, and made all their decisions collectively. They shared their bounty out in what Rediker calls "one of the most egalitarian plans for the disposition of resources to be found anywhere in the eighteenth century." They even took in escaped African slaves and lived with them as equals. The pirates showed "quite clearly - and subversively - that ships did not have to be run in the brutal and oppressive ways of the merchant service and the Royal navy." This is why they were popular, despite being unproductive thieves.

The words of one pirate from that lost age - a young British man called William Scott - should echo into this new age of piracy. Just before he was hanged in Charleston, South Carolina, he said: "What I did was to keep me from perishing. I was forced to go a-pirating to live." In 1991, the government of Somalia - in the Horn of Africa - collapsed. Its nine million people have been teetering on starvation ever since - and many of the ugliest forces in the Western world have seen this as a great opportunity to steal the country's food supply and dump our nuclear waste in their seas.

Yes: nuclear waste. As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died. Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: "Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury - you name it." Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to "dispose" of cheaply. When I asked Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: "Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention." (empasis added)

At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia's seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish-stocks by over-exploitation - and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300m worth of tuna, shrimp, lobster and other sea-life is being stolen every year by vast trawlers illegally sailing into Somalia's unprotected seas. The local fishermen have suddenly lost their livelihoods, and they are starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka 100km south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: "If nothing is done, there soon won't be much fish left in our coastal waters."

This is the context in which the men we are calling "pirates" have emerged. Everyone agrees they were ordinary Somalian fishermen who at first took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least wage a 'tax' on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia - and it's not hard to see why. In a surreal telephone interview, one of the pirate leaders, Sugule Ali, said their motive was "to stop illegal fishing and dumping in our waters… We don't consider ourselves sea bandits. We consider sea bandits [to be] those who illegally fish and dump in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas." William Scott would understand those words.

No, this doesn't make hostage-taking justifiable, and yes, some are clearly just gangsters - especially those who have held up World Food Programme supplies. But the "pirates" have the overwhelming support of the local population for a reason. The independent Somalian news-site WardherNews conducted the best research we have into what ordinary Somalis are thinking - and it found 70 percent "strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence of the country's territorial waters." During the revolutionary war in America, George Washington and America's founding fathers paid pirates to protect America's territorial waters, because they had no navy or coastguard of their own. Most Americans supported them. Is this so different?

Did we expect starving Somalians to stand passively on their beaches, paddling in our nuclear waste, and watch us snatch their fish to eat in restaurants in London and Paris and Rome? We didn't act on those crimes - but when some of the fishermen responded by disrupting the transit-corridor for 20 percent of the world's oil supply, we begin to shriek about "evil." If we really want to deal with piracy, we need to stop its root cause - our crimes - before we send in the gun-boats to root out Somalia's criminals.

The story of the 2009 war on piracy was best summarised by another pirate, who lived and died in the fourth century BC. He was captured and brought to Alexander the Great, who demanded to know "what he meant by keeping possession of the sea." The pirate smiled, and responded: "What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you, who do it with a great fleet, are called emperor." Once again, our great imperial fleets sail in today - but who is the robber?

Johann Hari is a writer for the Independent newspaper.

Cliffnotes:
  • Since the collapse of the Somali government, Western powers have been dumping nuclear waste in Somali waters
  • Many have died and have been affected by the effects of harmful metals such as mercury, as well as radiation.
  • 300million dollars worth of seafood is being illegally taken from Somalia's unprotected waters by European powers. People are already starving in the country, they can't withstand to lose any more natural resources.
  • Somali pirates are only trying to bring attention to this and protect their own waters. They are not "looters." They are volunteer coastguards.
Does this justify the hostage situation and what not? Absolutely not.

But here is my question. Do you think that people would know these facts if they hadn't made headlines with their violence?

I don't think so. And I think it's sad that they had to resort to those measures.
 
Very interesting.

I'll have to research this more and save this article for when I get home.
 
I dont we're being lied to, we're just not being told enough apparently. Thats a lame situation for them.
 
I read some of it and then scrolled down to see how much there was but from the cliff notes I'm gonna have to fully read up on this later Western media ftl
smh.gif
 
european governments. wow. not much has changed. prince to their own people thief to the world.
 
i got excited with this article until i saw huffington post. good read though. even without the dumping of nuclear waste in the waters, europeans are stilloverfishing the area decreasing the number of fish. its no surprise that many pirate are former fishermen.
 
I dont care if they were chinese, mexican, or european pirates

they hyjacked a boat and waived guns at a captain


kill them
 
Originally Posted by Mo Matik

I really suggest you read this NT but I'll add Cliffnotes at the bottom anyway.

  • Somali pirates are only trying to bring attention to this and protect their own waters. They are not "looters." They are volunteer coastguards.
Does this justify the hostage situation and what not? Absolutely not.

But here is my question. Do you think that people would know these facts if they hadn't made headlines with their violence?

I don't think so. And I think it's sad that they had to resort to those measures.


What are you talking about? They're hijacking ships and holding them for ransom... they're not "coastguards". Yes, we know Somalia isimpovrished, famine is widespread, the pirates are just "products of their environment" etc, but don't try to paint them in a positive light.What they're doing is wrong, regardless of why they're doing it or who they're helping when they do it.

Its even worse that you're implying that they PLANNED to be in a standoff with the navy and get killed as some sort of martyrdom to bring attention totheir situation.
smh.gif
They did what they did because they wanted money, plain and simple. #!#+ like this happens all the time off Somalia's coast, the onlyreason that it was as big as it was was because the government became involved.
 
There are more than one "strain" of "pirate" fam...Read the article and the OP's cliff notes in their entirety.
 
Somali pirates have accused European firms of dumping toxic waste off the Somali coast and are demanding an $8m ransom for the return of a Ukranian ship they captured, saying the money will go towards cleaning up the waste.

The ransom demand is a means of "reacting to the toxic waste that has been continually dumped on the shores of our country for nearly 20 years", Januna Ali Jama, a spokesman for the pirates, based in the semi-autonomous region of Puntland, said.

"The Somali coastline has been destroyed, and we believe this money is nothing compared to the devastation that we have seen on the seas."
The pirates are holding the MV Faina, a Ukrainian ship carrying tanks and military hardware, off Somalia's northern coast.

According to the International Maritime Bureau, 61 attacks by pirates have been reported since the start of the year. While money is the primary objective of the hijackings, claims of the continued environmental destruction off Somalia's coast have been largely ignored by the regions's maritime authorities.



http://axisoflogic.com/ar...lish/Article_55437.shtml
 
All of it may be true but I doubt that the common Somalian cares... They're holding ship for ransoms...which implies that
they're in it for the money and nothing else.
 
Originally Posted by KICKINHEADZ1010

All of it may be true but I doubt that the common Somalian cares... They're holding ship for ransoms...which implies that
they're in it for the money and nothing else.


did you even read it? it is quite obvious the "common somalian" cares.
 
Originally Posted by CWrite78

Originally Posted by KICKINHEADZ1010

All of it may be true but I doubt that the common Somalian cares... They're holding ship for ransoms...which implies that
they're in it for the money and nothing else.


did you even read it? it is quite obvious the "common somalian" cares.

QFT. People are so quick to rush to conclusions. I wish people would be more impartial.
mad.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom