Arbitrary title discussion is always a low point in this thread
Originally Posted by Big J 33
The superstar debate is flawed from the get-go.
Everyone just ends up arguing in circles because one person defines a superstar as a top 3, 5, 10, etc. player.. while another defines it as someone who can be the face of your franchise, sell merchandise, get commercials, etc.... while others use the term interchangeably with "franchise player". To me, the "superstar" title only falls on a few, elite players on the court and that can be the face of the league and that your Mom who doesn't watch basketball would know. And that's just my definition
so there's the basic problem.
What I said the last time this debate popped up. People are arguing over a stupid title with 5 different definitions
What's the point?
Originally Posted by awwsome
@ most of y'all just complaining about the trolling instead adding anything meaningful your damn selves.
But that's the thing.. we don't ALWAYS have to say something. If there's nothing to discuss, can't we just got a few hours without a lot of activity in here?
People should know better than to fuel these kind of arguments.