FSU QB Released Vol. Don't Put Your Hands ON Me

TIP said it the best..

"Disrespect will not be disregarded. You cross that line I'm goin' off bout mine.
Man woman and child, no exception. No disrespect will be tolerated"

Chick got what she deserved
 
heLiumcLinton said:
RIP sleazyy said:
2. if any man wants to hit a woman then go right ahead but don't be upset and cry a river when there is also a repercussion for your actions
Click to expand...


This should apply to everyone.
Click to expand...

It does

The repercussion of her hitting a man was a black eye and blood leaking from her face

The repercussion of him hitting a woman was the lost of a scholarship

Both got punished
Click to expand...


It doesn't apply to everyone and you know this :lol:
 
In the midst of the NFL dealing with and proving points and fighting against WOMAN ABUSE, its only right that the NCAA do the same. Yea its stupid as hell what he did, but in the wake of everything going on its the right call. hell even if it wasn't in the wake of everything. it still isn't right to hit a chick.. UNLESS...... na it isn't right. maybe ronda rousey ... lol
 
flightman said:
TIP said it the best..

"Disrespect will not be disregarded. You cross that line I'm goin' off bout mine.
Man woman and child, no exception. No disrespect will be tolerated"

Chick got what she deserved
Click to expand...
Yeah, keep listening to Clifford...
 
youngwolf said:
For me at least, a lot of that has to do with threat level. I don't think anyone should put their hands on me, but I also don't think that gives me a right to go and pummel them for doing so. Whether they be male or female, if they are significantly weaker and smaller than me, I'm not really going to get in a physical altercation with them.
Click to expand...
pummel? #ntextreme



And you said male or female... Okay, that's understandable.

But again, just because someone is weaker, male or female, doesn't absolve them of their ability to control emotion.





heLiumcLinton said:
It does

The repercussion of her hitting a man was a black eye and blood leaking from her face

The repercussion of him hitting a woman was the lost of a scholarship

Both got punished
Click to expand...

Boy, if you don't get back to lipstickalley with that bird logic.

:lol:
 
flightman said:
TIP said it the best..

"Disrespect will not be disregarded. You cross that line I'm goin' off bout mine.
Man woman and child, no exception. No disrespect will be tolerated"

Chick got what she deserved
Click to expand...

And that boys wife ***** behind his back :lol:

Choose your role models wisely
 
Fontaine said:
 
youngwolf said:
For me at least, a lot of that has to do with threat level. I don't think anyone should put their hands on me, but I also don't think that gives me a right to go and pummel them for doing so. Whether they be male or female, if they are significantly weaker and smaller than me, I'm not really going to get in a physical altercation with them.
Click to expand...
pummel? #ntextreme



And you said male or female... Okay, that's understandable.

But again, just because someone is weaker, male or female, doesn't absolve them of their ability to control emotion.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean it to say the guy pummeled her. I just chose to use the word pummel. I can you hit if you'd like.

And to your second point, a weaker/smaller person not being able to control their emotion is going to do a lot less damage than me hitting them for not being able to control their emotion.
 
Last edited:
RustyShackleford said:
If you tell say:

Dear women- Don't hit a man, cause he might hit you back

Dear men- Don't hit a woman, cause you might catch an assault charge

Then If dudes want fairness, then they should be arguing that both parties get charged with assault. Not that both parties should get a pass on throwing punches.

Cause that isn't really a "fair" outcome. The punch ole boy ate and the one homegirl ate weren't the same

The "white knights" are be accused of treating women like children, but isn't "well she did me first" the most childish excuse that can come outta someone's mouth?
Click to expand...

true...

look, i'm past the hitting women stuff... people dont really grasp that concept and think when you say anything about being physical with a women, you're embracing whippin' *** because she didnt was the dishes on some old school woman beating stuff.



I'm just speaking to the initiation and restraint aspect.

why couldnt she walk away? why couldnt she show restraint?

also, i dont think people are pointing and saying "well she did it first" excuse... they're saying that you cannot try and settle disputes with violence, and then be shocked when someone responds by also settling it with violence...

it's also about being accountable... i'm fairly certain that if he would've restrained her... then walked away.. and she followed him... and kept messing with him to the point she got kicked out of the bar...

there would be no repercussions aside from getting kicked out said bar... why? because she will not be held accountable for being drunk and belligerent.
 
RustyShackleford said:
If you tell say:

Dear women- Don't hit a man, cause he might hit you back

Dear men- Don't hit a woman, cause you might catch an assault charge

Then if dudes want fairness, then they should be arguing that both parties get charged with assault. Not that both parties should get a pass on throwing punches.

Cause that isn't really a "fair" outcome. The punch ole boy ate and the one homegirl ate weren't the same

The "white knights" are be accused of treating women like children, but isn't "well she did me first" the most childish excuse that can come outta someone's mouth?
Click to expand...
It is ...

But if that was a guy throwing the first punch, that's exactly what most would be saying.

Furthermore, when there's clear evidence, the person that initiated the physical altercation is the person that should be responsible for the consequences.

Of course this is easy because the guy wasn't hurt and he put a stop to the altercation with a vicious punch to the face; however, there will be the time that the guys walks away and the assault continues and you never know what could happen.

I think this shouldnt have happen, the dude could of have handle things much different. 
 
youngwolf said:
I didn't mean it to say the guy pummeled her. I just chose to use the word pummel. I can you hit if you'd like.

And to your second point, a weaker/smaller person not being able to control their emotion is going to do a lot less damage than me hitting them for not being able to control their emotion.
Click to expand...

and yet... this still doesnt absolve them of being able to control thier emotions though, famb...

that's what i'm trying to say...



a mentally stagnated person cant control their emotion... a child cant control their emotion...

23 year old fully functional adults can control their emotion.
 
Fontaine said:
and yet... this still doesnt absolve them of being able to control thier emotions though, famb...

that's what i'm trying to say...



a mentally stagnated person cant control their emotion... a child cant control their emotion...

23 year old fully functional adults can control their emotion.
Click to expand...

this took place in a freakin college club
 
Fontaine said:
it's also about being accountable... i'm fairly certain that if he would've restrained her... then walked away.. and she followed him... and kept messing with him to the point she got kicked out of the bar...

there would be no repercussions aside from getting kicked out said bar... why? because she will not be held accountable for being drunk and belligerent.
Click to expand...

So getting kicked out of the bar wouldn't be enough accountability for you?
 
I'm not even mad. She was physically restraining him from getting to a spot, raised her hand as if she was going to hit him, kicked him, punched him then got a taste of her own medicine. Humbled. Did she get any type of punishment?
 
sooperhooper said:
I'm not even mad. She was physically restraining him from getting to a spot, raised her hand as if she was going to hit him, kicked him, punched him then got a taste of her own medicine. Humbled. Did she get any type of punishment?
Click to expand...
Racist white woman vs Teenager black kid

what you think?
 
After two years under the radar at a community college and we will see him back competing for a starting spot at a division 1 program. He has to know better than to hit a woman. I understand why the program got rid of him because they don't need any backlash especially after the things they've dealt with involving Winston the last couple of years.

With that said, if anybody should be considered a thug in this situation, it's her. Wish he wouldn't have hit her because he had more to lose, but she definitely should face consequences too for being the aggressor and kneeing and swinging on him first. If he was a regular student without a full ride to lose, I would have zero problem with him retaliating with a punch. Nobody should put their hands on anyone. I wish he would have just spit on her or threw some drinks on her or something of that nature. I don't feel sorry for her one bit though.

It was funny how all the guys around basically acted like they didn't see anything lol. The only ones who reacted were the females around her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom