TEEN GETS ON BUS WITH SEVERED ARM AFTER BROOKLYN SNEAKER ROBBERY VICTIM RUNS DOWN ASSAILANT IN SUV

So the cops can do what? Tell him sorry? I had some young punks break into my house and steal my xbox one and I was salivating over the thought of wishing I was home and blowing somebody's head off not because they took a $350 console from me that could be replaced but for having the audacity to TAKE something from me. That kid was 17 and risked his life and freedom for some sneakers and tried to rob a man who was trying to get business handled with him the fair way. The driver is not in the wrong at all.

The kid has at least one arm to hold an L

You are a terrible human being and this planet would be better off without you on it. And I couldn't be more serious.

You're the type to become a cop and thinks it's ok to blow somebody's head off cause they disrespected you. You probably are a cop talking about salivating at the thought of shooting someone in the head. You are a monster and need to seek help. You d not belong in civilized society

How could you even miss the irony here? He's talking about having someone gone for stealing a piddly old video game, you want him gone for words.

Difference is I'm not getting a boner thinking about actually taking him off the planet. Doesn't make the statement Any less factual tho.
 
In the eyes of the "law" you don't have the "right" to kill people who rob you I'm aware of that. My point is most people including you which you've just demonstrated don't know the difference between right and wrong in the scope of true human freedom. You only know the man made laws of the land.
 
Last edited:
If you're life is threatened by violence and you did nothing to provoke it you have the right to defend yourself with lethal force if necessary. You killing in self defense is not violence because you did not VIOLATE anybody. It was self defense. The only violence that took place was the person attempting to rob you. But the system has us believing otherwise because they want us to hand over our RIGHT and RESPONSIBILITY to protect and defend ourselves to them.

If NECESSARY. In this case it was NOWHERE near necessary and that's the issue.
 
You 39 reselling sneakers and couldn't fend off a teen with a jammed gun, so you run him over....

[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

They need lock dude up so he can think about his life.
 
In the eyes of the "law" you don't have the "right" to kill people who rob you I'm aware of that. My point is most people including you which you've just demonstrated don't know the difference between right and wrong in the scope of true human freedom. You only know the man made laws of the land.

Ah I see, trying to kill someone over a pair of shoes is true human freedom. It's so unfortunate that we have these man made laws to restrict us from killing each other over nothing. Your views are so enlightening, tell me more. Lmao
 
Frank has never been robbed before. It's easy to say how one should feel from the comfort of their phone/computer desk. Like I said, get stuck up with a gun in your face and tell me how you feel then.
 
Ah I see, trying to kill someone over a pair of shoes is true human freedom. It's so unfortunate that we have these man made laws to restrict us from killing each other over nothing. Your views are so enlightening, tell me more. Lmao

Are you illiterate or did you just not read my other response?

I made a general statement about self defense. Had nothing to do with the incident in question, just a statement on self defense. Then you wanna say some cute **** about killing someone over a pair of shoes. pay attention champ.
 
Last edited:
You 39 reselling sneakers and couldn't fend off a teen with a jammed gun, so you run him over....

[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

They need lock dude up so he can think about his life.

:lol:
 
I'm not saying the dude driving wasn't wrong. I'm saying this kid woke up that morning and made a premeditated decision to go out and rob someone at gunpoint for some god damn Aqua 8s!? HE BROUGHT IT ALL ON HIMSELF. He's lucky he got out with his life.
I don't think anyone is disputing that which is why I'm wondering what you were arguing in the first place
laugh.gif
 

Bottom line, if you get jammed by all means defend yourself and protect what's worth it to you (which is also up for debate, I remember arguing with this one fool who swore he'd die for his Feindi belt)

But that's clearly not the position dude was in the moment he decided to run dude down . 
 
This. Cant do that **** in California either. Shoot somebody while theyre running away with your property? youre ******..

Sad that our laws are designed to protect thugs and criminals. Gives them an incentive to rob, knowing that if the victim retaliates they likely will face legal repercussions.

We know damn well had he went to the cops, getting his shoes back and bringing the thief to justice wouldn't be a priority to them either.
 
Dont eem care if the robber isnt charged, he lost his goddamn arm already. Thats worse than a few years in jail.
 
I don't feel sorry for the kid that lost his arm at all. He is a grown man not a child. In the end two lives were ruined over a pair of sneakers that cost $2.00 to make in China.
 
I don't feel sorry for the kid that lost his arm at all. He is a grown man not a child. In the end two lives were ruined over a pair of sneakers that cost $2.00 to make in China.

This is the sad part in all of this.

But the robber should be charged to the fullest extent he can be charged. If the other guys going to face charges, the person who caused all of this to begin with needs the book thrown at him.
 
Last edited:
Sad that our laws are designed to protect thugs and criminals. Gives them an incentive to rob, knowing that if the victim retaliates they likely will face legal repercussions.
 
And, none of this is true 
laugh.gif


I'm pretty sure dude had every legal right to protect himself
laugh.gif
 unless this was in NY where it can get tricky.
 
Just because you don't like it. It doesn't mean it's not true. You really think the cops are making busting the robber in a Craigslist sale that ended up a robbery a priority on their list of things to do?

The way the current setup is it gives robbers incentive to rob. Knowing that the victim can possibly face jail time if they retaliate out of anger.

And this was in Brooklyn. New Yorks gun laws are really strict.
 
Your trying to change the argument so you can be right.

Lawfully or unlawfully I will never condone these type of shenanigans. 
 
Not trying to change anything.

You never answered my questions though. Would the cops make getting this guy his shoes back and bringing the robber to justice a priority? Yes or no?

If I was a stickup kid and was aware that if the victim responds in an angry manner, they likely face jail time, it would make things easier for me. I know if the victim resorts to violence that he's going to go to jail and I can possibly sue him. I also know if I get away that the cops don't have time to be worrying about a petty stickup kid.

You compared this mans reaction to Zimmerman which didn't make sense. Zimmerman stalked and provoked a confrontation with an unarmed kid who was no danger to him. This guy tried to sell a pair of sneakers and got robbed at gunpoint. Had the sale when as planned and money was exchanged for sneakers, none of this happens right?

But no, that criminal robbed an innocent man at gun point, and the victim chased him down in his car in hopes of getting his shoes back. He lost an arm because he thought he had an easy come up.

And I see nothing wrong with shooting a robber when they're fleeing. They break in your house where your wife and kids live, they might come back and do it again. Minus whale prevent that from happening.
 
Kingkoopa has never been robbed. Let that scum put a gun in your face and THEN keep singing your song. Again, let it happen to you and then come back and tell me how you "would" have reacted.
 
Not trying to change anything.

You never answered my questions though. Would the cops make getting this guy his shoes back and bringing the robber to justice a priority? Yes or no?

If I was a stickup kid and was aware that if the victim responds in an angry manner, they likely face jail time, it would make things easier for me. I know if the victim resorts to violence that he's going to go to jail and I can possibly sue him. I also know if I get away that the cops don't have time to be worrying about a petty stickup kid.

You compared this mans reaction to Zimmerman which didn't make sense. Zimmerman stalked and provoked a confrontation with an unarmed kid who was no danger to him. This guy tried to sell a pair of sneakers and got robbed at gunpoint. Had the sale when as planned and money was exchanged for sneakers, none of this happens right?

But no, that criminal robbed an innocent man at gun point, and the victim chased him down in his car in hopes of getting his shoes back. He lost an arm because he thought he had an easy come up.

And I see nothing wrong with shooting a robber when they're fleeing. They break in your house where your wife and kids live, they might come back and do it again. Minus whale prevent that from happening.

LMAO...Really?

He chased him to run him over.

There is also something very wrong with shooting somebody in the back if they're fleeing as is shown in the law.
 
Back
Top Bottom