- 1,338
- 224
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
^ like I said, dude is rational and calm behind his computer screen. Stick a gun in his face and I'm sure he wouldn't be saying all this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This man is correct. I don't get why people are trying to defend the criminal who maliciously plotted this.If running him over because he refuses to stop so I can get back something I spent my hard earned money on is an option, I rather do that then take the L.
I wouldn't reverse and run him over again. I'd just recover the stolen property, and place the neutralized threat under citizens arrest until local law enforcement comes. I'd feel good knowing I got an armed robber off the streets.
no one is taking up for the robber.. he will get charged with crime as well. The point being is that the driver DID sit back and chill during the commission of the crime and when the adrenaline hit him afterwards he decided to turn around and run over the fleeing thief after he was leaving the scene of the crime. You can't claim you acted in self defense this way. This is retaliation. Even in florida where there are stand your ground laws, you can't shoot someone in the back and think your just going to jump a hoop to beat the case.. the law doesn't work that way
This man is correct. I don't get why people are trying to defend the criminal who maliciously plotted this.
The law makes no sense sometimes and sometimes you just gotta take matters into your own hand. The VICTIM was THREATENED at gun point. Do people really expect him to sit back and chill?
To be fair, the victim retaliated because he knows if he doesn't do something, he will forever be mentally scarred. The victim retaliating gives himself some closure and justice. He retaliated because he knows that if he doesn't, no one will.
by running him over and possibly committing vehicular homicide? nahHe was getting his stuff back though. I doubt if he said "hey thief, stop running and give me my shoes back" that the thief would've complied so that was the best option to deter the thief and prevent him from escaping.
That's what most are getting at here. I hope in the court of law, statutes, decision and remedies are amended to help the 'actual' victim here.
no one is taking up for the robber.. he will get charged with crime as well. The point being is that the driver DID sit back and chill during the commission of the crime and when the adrenaline hit him afterwards he decided to turn around and run over the fleeing thief after he was leaving the scene of the crime. You can't claim you acted in self defense this way. This is retaliation. Even in florida where there are stand your ground laws, you can't shoot someone in the back and think your just going to jump a hoop to beat the case.. the law doesn't work that way
I actually live in Manhattan Beach California. A pretty nice neighborhood if you ever heard of it.
And lmao at how you reworded things to portray it in your favor. You're taking a serious risk when you commit a robbery. There's a chance you might get some stuff for free when you pull a gun out on someone. There's also a chance you might get caught and do jail time or try the wrong person. No matter how you try to twist things that's just how it is. And if you try the wrong person and it goes badly for you, you deserve no sympathy for your premeditated actions. I'm a sympathetic person. Just not towards robbers and criminals.
thats real.Didn't say you needed to have sympathy, just don't mow them down with your car after the fact and think you're legit. Criminals have a right to due process in this country, you can't play judge, jury and executioner in the street. You're not special. No normal, level headed adult thinks thats acceptable behavior.
no one is taking up for the robber.. he will get charged with crime as well. The point being is that the driver DID sit back and chill during the commission of the crime and when the adrenaline hit him afterwards he decided to turn around and run over the fleeing thief after he was leaving the scene of the crime. You can't claim you acted in self defense this way. This is retaliation. Even in florida where there are stand your ground laws, you can't shoot someone in the back and think your just going to jump a hoop to beat the case.. the law doesn't work that way
That's what most are getting at here. I hope in the court of law, statutes, decision and remedies are amended to help the 'actual' victim here.
Didn't say you needed to have sympathy, just don't mow them down with your car after the fact and think you're legit. Criminals have a right to due process in this country, you can't play judge, jury and executioner in the street. You're not special. No normal, level headed adult thinks thats acceptable behavior.
thats real.
^ like I said, dude is rational and calm behind his computer screen. Stick a gun in his face and I'm sure he wouldn't be saying all this.
The funniest thing about this is that people hate small time criminals more than embezzlers, guys who steal pensions, people use tax/public money for personal use, criminal banker types, wall street type people who destroyed the economy etc