- 1,683
- 308
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'm looking for the KD jacket myself but the Heat's site has LeBron's and Wade's available for sale. Only ones I've seen so far.Any info on where to purchase the all star player jacket? Those were really nice this year..
I actually agree though.People forget the Kobe haterz argument that "Kobe ride shaq to 3 rings = he only has 2" because the only way to legit win a ring you have to carry your team, thus only about 10 guys have ever won rings.
It's ridiculous. Youre on a championship team, you won, you got a ring. period. You're not gonna take luke Walton's rings away from the books
That said, I don't think he leaves either. One last push in the next 2 years and that's it.
I actually agree though.
I pretty much said he worked to get those rings and I personally believe they're rightfully his. The second part is just a comparison though as far as what Jordan/Kobe needed to do and what he needed to do in order to get them.
I don't. "It's a common opinion" implies that it isn't mine. He worked for those rings, and they didn't fall into his lap (though if he would've won in 2011 it would have.)
I do think that he had to do less than Jordan/Kobe did to get his championships though. By "do less" I mean he didn't need to maintain a constant presence and impact on games every single night. He could seriously have a 15 or less point game with mediocre stats and still win playoff games, and actually I think he has. Jordan/Kobe wouldn't be able pull that off successfully and especially not on multiple occasions.
i never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
I pretty much said he worked to get those rings and I personally believe they're rightfully his. The second part is just a comparison though as far as what Jordan/Kobe needed to do and what he needed to do in order to get them.
i never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
like how is going 6/6 in the finals better than going 6/8?
so in a 8 year span its better to win 6 championships and lose in the 2nd round twice than it is to get to the finals 8 times and win 6 of them?you are really dumb if you dont get THATi never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
like how is going 6/6 in the finals better than going 6/8?
how am i wrong?Of course you think that
Why don't you follow your own advice and go back and read the sequence of posts that brought us here. Then after you've done that and realized YOU started an argument with me over something we both agree on, you can feel free to come back and say, "My bad" or simply not respond out of stubbornness. Either way I don't really care. I'm done with you.This is why you should read before responding. He said Lin was Melo's help. I said Lin was trash with melo and only good this season and linsanity hype. Meaning he is not any help.***** wtf are you talking about? The only person not making sense is youBravelude asked if Lin was trash. I said he was. Then you said some **** about this season like it ******* matters. I said it doesn't cuz we're talking about Lin on the knicks and now you're asking me if I thought he was some all star caliber player? WHAT?
I swear some dudes are just slow as hell.
so in a 8 year span its better to win 6 championships and lose in the 2nd round twice than it is to get to the finals 8 times and win 6 of them?
i never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
like how is going 6/6 in the finals better than going 6/8?
you are really dumb if you dont get THAT
how is it better for someones legacy to NOT make the finals?
always thought kareem's 6/10 finals is way more impressive than jordan's 6/6
making the finals last year and being 4/5 is better for duncan's legacy than if he had lost in the first round again and kept is perfect 4/4
no, 5 < 6Basically if a player have more finals appearances it's more impressive to you. So if LeBron goes 5 out of 9 in the finals will that be more impressive than Jordan's 6-6 record? I'm curiousso in a 8 year span its better to win 6 championships and lose in the 2nd round twice than it is to get to the finals 8 times and win 6 of them?i never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
like how is going 6/6 in the finals better than going 6/8?
you are really dumb if you dont get THAT
how is it better for someones legacy to NOT make the finals?
always thought kareem's 6/10 finals is way more impressive than jordan's 6/6
making the finals last year and being 4/5 is better for duncan's legacy than if he had lost in the first round again and kept is perfect 4/4
so in a 8 year span its better to win 6 championships and lose in the 2nd round twice than it is to get to the finals 8 times and win 6 of them?
i never understood why "6 rings undefeated" is such a big dealI think 5 rings is good for Kobe's legacy
Even if he got another one or two.....he's still not passing Jordan
6 rings undefeated > Kobe 5 rings with Finals losses, Magic's 5 rings with Finals losses, Shaqs 4 rings with Finals losses or Lebrons however many rings with Finals losses.
like how is going 6/6 in the finals better than going 6/8?
you are really dumb if you dont get THAT
how is it better for someones legacy to NOT make the finals?
always thought kareem's 6/10 finals is way more impressive than jordan's 6/6
making the finals last year and being 4/5 is better for duncan's legacy than if he had lost in the first round again and kept is perfect 4/4
nothing to do with me being a lakers fan, i wasnt alive to see kareem so im just going off what i have read about him and his career.Well it's not a right or wrong answer.. it's about what one finds more impressive, that's pretty subjective. But you're a Lakers fan, so I'm assuming you're biased when it comes to finding Kareem's more impressive than Jordan's or not getting why going 6 for 6 in the Finals is impressive.