lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
That sounds like something the Oakland A's would do...except Oakland isn't a small market
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bron and kd did the same exact thing, took the easiest way out possible. If the Celtics somehow had the cap space and were friends with bron he maybe would've went there who knows, same way we assume okc would've beat the Cavs. But wait he would've been with 3 past prime stars and ball dominant Rondo so no. I was heated at first but now I'm like u know what, who cares? He stays in Cleveland and never wins we kill him for having no rings, he leaves and goes to the place that gives him the best we discredit the rings. Then let's be real, he ain't wanna play russy ball no more and I don't blame him . Dudes talking bout they would've respected him for going to Washington then the same dude's would've clowned him for not getting past the cavs. Taking the easy way out is taking the easy way out, dude's trying to dissect text messages and **** so they can hate on kd and still praise LeBron. If 1 is sucker **** the other is also.
Can't trade LMA. He's our only big. Trading him won't get us a quality big back and we'd lose the trade for sure.
Dedmon and Simmons are likely not coming back.
I don't expect to see Patty back either.
Warriors are the fifth No. 1 seed Spurs’ Gregg Popovich has faced in playoffs. He is 1-3, the win coming in 2005 conference finals vs Suns.
Happy mothers day.
exactlyI still don't understand why a player wouldn't/ shouldn't take the "easy way"out when all they will be judged on is rings.
here goes espn with the dumb ****...so what SAS are better w/o him?Things that make you go hmmm...
Apparently it's a little more nuanced than that.I still don't understand why a player wouldn't/ shouldn't take the "easy way"out when all they will be judged on is rings.
i would really like to see Simmons back but somebody is going to throw him so good breadCan't trade LMA. He's our only big. Trading him won't get us a quality big back and we'd lose the trade for sure.
Dedmon and Simmons are likely not coming back.
I don't expect to see Patty back either.
Memphis may mess around and throw him the bread. I feel like they are gonna do a salary dump on Parsons and trade him elsewhere.i would really like to see Simmons back but somebody is going to throw him so good bread
SAS gotta bring Patty back...Murray not ready yet.
Oh that was a real shot? I thought it was tongue in cheek, like if someone were to be like "If that's what you think, cool, but be sure to tighten your helmet when you go out today."is what It is man.. I expected shots like that. Don't bother me. You share something with nt got to know it's going to get brought up in an argument by someone who don't know how to act right over the net. Learned that a long time ago. I only share what I wouldn't mind being thrown back at me.You gotta pull up after that
I've shared bout my illness in other threads. No big Thing..
Absolutely.exactlyI still don't understand why a player wouldn't/ shouldn't take the "easy way"out when all they will be judged on is rings.
Harden didn't want to play behind Westbrook as far as I see it.How do you manage to draft 3 MVP caliber players in consecutive years as well as a shot blocking big who would later expand his range and still eff it up?
Entire front office should be fired. Smh.
It's 9 games vs 85 games. There's nothing to look at the stat is stupid.honestly that kawhi stat is a little interesting. Obviously the Spurs are better with him but maybe there's a ball flow issue. I want to go back and watch the other games.
Considering the sample size is also small to why people think Kyrie/Love wouldn't be a playoff team without LeBron, this is a fair argument.
ESPN and their fake journalism. Quoting this in percentages instead of absolute numbers because obviously the sample size discrepancy makes this irrelevant. "What are we missing here" as if it isn't blatantly obvious. How about the fact that you're comparing 9 games to 85?
This is mad stupid.