Air Jordan 2011 Concord

[mahleek]

Got these off eBay, can still return but wanted to make sure first. They look a little off to me but it's my first pair of 11's and I heard quality control with this release was pretty bad. Excuse the messiness of the room, has yet to be cleaned 

 

[demonicquiiks]

authentic! 

 

[timmybrixxx]

10000% GM.. dont listen to this idiot above me, get your $ back fam!

I mean anyone who knows their stuff KNOWS these are GMs and thats all they will EVER be. Just look at the backs of those kicks SMH.. 

 

[mahleek]

 
10000% GM.. dont listen to this idiot above me, get your $ back fam!

I mean anyone who knows their stuff KNOWS these are GMs and thats all they will EVER be. Just look at the backs of those kicks SMH.. 

Yeah that's the main thing that was bugging me. Even with ****** quality control the 23's were in hella stupid positions. I was grasping cuz I won the bid for em at 185 and was hoping for legit but I just opened a eBay claim now so **** it.

 

[timmybrixxx]

 
Yeah that's the main thing that was bugging me. Even with ****** quality control the 23's were in hella stupid positions. I was grasping cuz I won the bid for em at 185 and was hoping for legit but I just opened a eBay claim now so **** it.

its not the position.. its the font and just quality in general. positioning can be a manf defect, changing the font is not.. notice the fake is squashed and elongated a tad..

 

[mahleek]

 
its not the position.. its the font and just quality in general. positioning can be a manf defect, changing the font is not.. notice the fake is squashed and elongated a tad..

Well that actually makes me feel like they're authentic then, if the positioning can be off by that much. Looking at many other pictures of the 2011 Concords, all the 23's have the strechier look than the squareish one on those Jam's. Seen: 

http://cdn.*************.com/media/u/images/air-jordan-xi-concord-detailed (24).jpg

Even more so noticeable when compared to the 2000's: http://cdn.*************.com/media/u/images/air-jordan-xi-concord-2011-vs-2000 (8).jpg

And in this video, dude has his retail pair from foot locker and the right shoe has the same stretch to it : 

Edit: Did not know those links would be censored lol. Anyway proper time in video is 2:29, **** the links

 

[bcdagr8]

I would say GM also. The 23 looks stretched on my RD pair the 23 is not stretched at all

 

[timmybrixxx]

 
Well that actually makes me feel like they're authentic then, if the positioning can be off by that much. Looking at many other pictures of the 2011 Concords, all the 23's have the strechier look than the squareish one on those Jam's. Seen: 

http://cdn.*************.com/media/u/images/air-jordan-xi-concord-detailed (24).jpg

Even more so noticeable when compared to the 2000's: http://cdn.*************.com/media/u/images/air-jordan-xi-concord-2011-vs-2000 (8).jpg

And in this video, dude has his retail pair from foot locker and the right shoe has the same stretch to it : 

Edit: Did not know those links would be censored lol. Anyway proper time in video is 2:29, **** the links

na man they are GM for sure.. Trust me. pretty much all of the tells.

stretched 23

white toes

rounded off midsoles on heel

PL cut on heels is off

ICEY soles

Etc, Etc... 

* some of these inconsistencies also happen on RD pairs too, but your pair has every issue. Most def a GM iMO. 

 

[mahleek]

Aiight well **** it then, I'mma just return em. Thanks for the help yall