Yes my dad saw the second one from his job in northern NJAnyone here actually see with their own 2 eyes or know anyone who saw with their own 2 eyes the planes flying into the towers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes my dad saw the second one from his job in northern NJAnyone here actually see with their own 2 eyes or know anyone who saw with their own 2 eyes the planes flying into the towers?
but wouldnt a violent midair explosion (fighter missile) cause a breakup at altitude, and then a crater would be even less likely? You woukd think a million pieces flying down isnt going to make a crater like one massive piece would.I kinda believe that...it's a bit odd that the craft body effectively disintegrated in a smoking crater after the crash.
I see why you wouldn't want to tell the citizens of the country that you had to blow up a passenger airliner with a cruise missile for national security purposes, but honestly it makes more sense than the contention that the entire aviation industry passed around the idiot ball for over an hour while the country was under attack.
I will say there are recordings of the passenger uprising out there--the hijackers struggling, the cockpit being battered, general chaos--but you never know.
hell, ya know what? here's how I lost an hour or two the other day.
of note, there just happened to be several terrorism practice exercises in play at the same time the events were unfolding--including, IIRC, a scenario featuring hijacked planes--leading to severe confusion with the military response.
yet another coincidence.
according to this article about the plane that got shot down in Malaysia a little while back, it depends strongly on where it hit...the wings contain the fuel (TIL) and it's possible that a missile would hit an area of the body that's not immediately explosive and leave enough wreckage to make a good size hole in the ground.but wouldnt a violent midair explosion (fighter missile) cause a breakup at altitude, and then a crater would be even less likely? You woukd think a million pieces flying down isnt going to make a crater like one massive piece would.
but if the plane was largely intact at impact it would also leave agood size hole, right?according to this article about the plane that got shot down in Malaysia a little while back, it depends strongly on where it hit...the wings contain the fuel (TIL) and it's possible that a missile would hit an area of the body that's not immediately explosive and leave enough wreckage to make a good size hole in the ground.
I'd imagine so, especially with the fuel burning on the ground.but if the plane was largely intact at impact it would also leave agood size hole, right?
It's crazy because I was Patriotic as fuh after 9/11. And every person I knew was as well for hella months after.
Now a lot of us feel used
idk bruh. It's deeper than that yo. The media played a huge role in bringing blk/white/Hispanic and all groups together around that time. Especially in the east coast. Unity was at an all time high. But it was all based on deceit.You've been hit by
You've been struck by
A bad case of patriotism
Dude, they are 2 Giant marks coming in off the ocean. I see your point but they were the largest things in the area. Yes. There were other tall buildings, but nothing nearly as wide, and if coming from the ocean side, nothing before
Ah see now this makes sense thank you for the clarification. I didnt know which side they were coming in from so it was a clear target for them.
I think the hijackers took flight classes. They also used flight simulators, which were an exact replica of an airplane. I hear the hardest part of flying a plane is takeoff and landing, so they didn't really need that training. I think they were trained in Florida a few months before. Basically all they had to do was keep the plane steady and go as fast as possible.
If thats all they had to do then I get it now. The easiest part was getting the planes to hit. All the prep and getting into the cockpit & things before were the hardest.
Thats IF "hijackers" even took over these plane but we'll never know.
This wasn't a Bush thing. It was a failure of the intelligence agencies.
As with most conspiracy cases, the actual truth (Osama Bin Laden executed 9/11) Is actually scarier than the conspiracy. It's pure lunacy to assume that it was an inside job, or that the government had so much to gain. What about Al Queda? Their movement has spread throughout the middle east, and it is because we reacted exactly as he planned.
I'll never forget where I was that day, crazy to think highschoolers now weren't even around. I'll never forget how Bush played Colin Powells credibility into taking us into war, I'll never forget all the datelines on the various victims. Man, those feels.
As with most conspiracy cases, the actual truth (Osama Bin Laden executed 9/11) Is actually scarier than the conspiracy. It's pure lunacy to assume that it was an inside job, or that the government had so much to gain. What about Al Queda? Their movement has spread throughout the middle east, and it is because we reacted exactly as he planned.
Can I ask who the senior officials were then? We know they tried blowing them up in 1993 right after Clinton took office and again in 2001 right after Bush took office. New administrations put in their own people in cabinet and intelligence positions so it's not far fetched that the same people were not in power when each attack took place on the twin towers.Its historical fact that governments/politicians/high ranking officials have plotted/executed terrorist attacks on their own people in order to sway public opinion on political/policy momentum for hundreds of years. To suggest its lunacy that the US would follow suit is rather short sighted and ignorant.As with most conspiracy cases, the actual truth (Osama Bin Laden executed 9/11) Is actually scarier than the conspiracy. It's pure lunacy to assume that it was an inside job, or that the government had so much to gain. What about Al Queda? Their movement has spread throughout the middle east, and it is because we reacted exactly as he planned.
As with most conspiracy cases, the actual truth (Osama Bin Laden executed 9/11) Is actually scarier than the conspiracy. It's pure lunacy to assume that it was an inside job, or that the government had so much to gain. What about Al Queda? Their movement has spread throughout the middle east, and it is because we reacted exactly as he planned.
Its historical fact that governments/politicians/high ranking officials have plotted/executed terrorist attacks on their own people in order to sway public opinion on political/policy momentum for hundreds of years. To suggest its lunacy that the US would follow suit is rather short sighted and ignorant.
Can I ask who the senior officials were then? We know they tried blowing them up in 1993 right after Clinton took office and again in 2001 right after Bush took office. New administrations put in their own people in cabinet and intelligence positions so it's not far fetched that the same people were not in power when each attack took place on the twin towers.
Additionally, if the fourth plane was in fact headed to the Capitol what would have happened if those "insiders" had actually let it hit and killed ~1/3 of the government?
Way more vague than the usage of government you are critiquing. The US executing it's citizens for the sake of causing war is asinine, and ignorant.Its historical fact that governments/politicians/high ranking officials have plotted/executed terrorist attacks on their own people in order to sway public opinion on political/policy momentum for hundreds of years. To suggest its lunacy that the US would follow suit is rather short sighted and ignorant.
As with most conspiracy cases, the actual truth (Osama Bin Laden executed 9/11) Is actually scarier than the conspiracy. It's pure lunacy to assume that it was an inside job, or that the government had so much to gain. What about Al Queda? Their movement has spread throughout the middle east, and it is because we reacted exactly as he planned.
I'll never forget where I was that day, crazy to think highschoolers now weren't even around. I'll never forget how Bush played Colin Powells credibility into taking us into war, I'll never forget all the datelines on the various victims. Man, those feels.
This wasn't a Bush thing. It was a failure of the intelligence agencies.
Governments being corrupt has nothing to do with it though. When you are throwing accusations like conspiracy to murder 4,000 civilians as being common place in American society, you listening to Alex Jones, and watching too many youtube videos. By that standard literally any tragedy can be said to have government influence. Is it Possible that the government could do something like this? I would say no. Assassination, Political posturing, and arms dealing is a far cry from murdering thousands of people for the sake of leveraging oil/sadaam/whatever reason ya'll like to claim...I agree with FrankMatthews. Governments have been corrupt and morally bankrupt for centuries.
These things have happened in the past. That is a fact. So to believe that it is impossible for it to happen in the present is asinine and ignorant.
Its historical fact that governments/politicians/high ranking officials have plotted/executed terrorist attacks on their own people in order to sway public opinion on political/policy momentum for hundreds of years. To suggest its lunacy that the US would follow suit is rather short sighted and ignorant.
Way more vague than the usage of government you are critiquing. The US executing it's citizens for the sake of causing war is asinine, and ignorant.
Who said anything about it being commonplace in American society?Governments being corrupt has nothing to do with it though. When you are throwing accusations like conspiracy to murder 4,000 civilians as being common place in American society, you listening to Alex Jones, and watching too many youtube videos. By that standard literally any tragedy can be said to have government influence. Is it Possible that the government could do something like this? I would say no. Assassination, Political posturing, and arms dealing is a far cry from murdering thousands of people for the sake of leveraging oil/sadaam/whatever reason ya'll like to claim...
Its historical fact that governments/politicians/high ranking officials have plotted/executed terrorist attacks on their own people in order to sway public opinion on political/policy momentum for hundreds of years. To suggest its lunacy that the US would follow suit is rather short sighted and ignorant.
Way more vague than the usage of government you are critiquing. The US executing it's citizens for the sake of causing war is asinine, and ignorant.
There really are people that evil though. Just look at historical figures who have killed thousands if not millions to do just that.Me personally I don't think people could be that evil to the point where they could get thousands of people on purpose to get their agenda across maybe I'm naive